Internetfreepress.com
Editor-Publisher, Jim Carroll, is a graduate of East Tennessee State University, post graduate work at E.T.S.U. and U.T. Served in the Air force.
Started career as a chemist Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Taught Science and Industrial Arts for 25 years. Publisher of 6 News Papers and the second largest
Cable TV publication in USA. Been president of several corporations. Author of Nature's Basic Law of Economics, The Philosophy of Mixturism, Born
Out of The Sun, Three Steps to Success, Utopia Now, Why We Dream, Words Every Good Reader Knows, Besure Your Child Learns to Read, 1100
Powerful Words, TheProblem with Public Education Is Administrative, and several science books. Produced over 100 DVDs on Science, Math, English, and
other subjects. Now devoting rest of life to the promotion of The Philosophy of Mixturism: Business and Government working together to meet the needs and
desires of all the people in a Regulated, Free and Fair Market Capatalist System of Private and Public Enterprise
This web site is different; it shouts! Help shout these messages out: put them on facebook and e-mail them to everyone you can. Send any comments
good, bad or indifferent to: 2201 Southern Shade Blvd. Knoxville, Tennessee 37932 phone 865-470-2610
Textbook DVD Videos - Click Here

To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;
Article 1, Section 8, Constitution. There are three ways. Why use only two? The Treasury Department needs to
by-pass the banks and made loans directly to small businesses with new money. There is nothing in the Constitution
that says that banks have the right to skim the cream off of all money milk. Why borrow money from China that they
created, and why pay taxpayers money to pay interest on it when we have the Constitutional authorty to coin money?
Where is the News Media that is supposed to keep them honest? Why should one industry (the banking industry) be
able to control the life blood of all industries?
-----
NATIONAL DEBT IS NOT YOURS OR YOUR CHILDREN OR YOUR GRANDCHILDREN
The Republican Party would be dead in the water if it didn't have this dead horse to beat.

THE BIGGEST LIE EVER PERPETRATED ON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE BY THE CONSERVATIVES AND CONGRESS IS TELLING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THAT THE NATIONAL DEBT IS THEIR DEBT, THEIR CHILDREN’S DEBT AND THEIR GRANDCHILDREN’S DEBT. THIS IS ABSOLUTELY FALSE. THE GOVERNMENT’S DEBT IS THE GOVERNMENT’S DEBT AND NOT THE PEOPLE’S DEBT, AND THE GOVERNMENT IS IN A POSITION TO EASILY MANAGE THEIR DEBT.

CONSIDER THESE FACTS: THE TOTAL ASSETS OF THE U.S. ECONOMY IS $213 TRILLION, AND THE NATIONAL DEBT IS $13.1 TILLION, WHICH IS ONLY 6.1% OF THE TOTAL ASSETS.
THE GDP DOES NOT GO BACKTO ZERO ON DECEMBER THIRTY- FIRST OF EACH YEAR, BUT EACH MONTH KEEPS ADDING TO THE ECONOMIC ASSETS OF THE U.S. ECONOMY. ARTICLE
1, SECTION 8, OF THE CONSTITUTION GIVES THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THE POWER TO BORROW MONEY ON ITS ASSETS, THE POWER TO TAX, AND THE
POWER TO CREATE MONEY.

HOW WOULD YOU LIKE TO OWE ONLY 6.1% OF YOUR ECONOMIC ASSETS , BE ABLE TO COLLECT TAXES FROM EVERYONE IN AMERICA, AND BE ABLE TO CREATE MONEY? THAT’S THE STATUS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, WHICH HAS THE MEANS TO COPE WITH ANY FINANCIAL SITUATION.

IF YOU ARE LOSING SLEEP OVER THE NATIONAL DEBT AND THINKING THAT SOCIAL SECURITY AND MEDICARE ARE GOING BROKE, GO BACK TO SLEEP. THAT WILL NEVER HAPPEN. IF YOU WANT TO WORRY ABOUT THESE THINGS, DON’T WORRY ABOUT THE MONEY PART. ANY DEFICIT CAN BE MADE UP OUT OF GENERAL FUNDS.

THIS BIG LIE ABOUT THE NATIONAL DEBT STANDS IN THE WAY OF THE GOVERNMENT SPENDING AS MUCH MONEY AS IT SHOULD TO EDUCATE, TO PROVIDE EMPLOYMENT, TO HAVE UNIVERSAL
HEALTH CARE, TO KEEP A BALANCED MONEY SUPPLY AT ALL TIMES, AND TO INITIATE PROGRAMS TO PROVIDE GOOD HOUSING FOR ALL THE PEOPLE.

IN SUMMARY, YOU DON’T OWE A CENT ON THE NATIONAL DEBT, AND THE GOVERNMENT IS NOT BROKE BUT RATHER IT IS IN EXCELLENT SHAPE.

WE NEED TO TAX LESS, BORROW LESS, AND CREATE MORE MONEY.

CONSERVATIVES STAND IN THE WAY OF PROGESSIVE IDEAS, RAILING AGAINST BIG GOVERNMENT AND TALKING ENDLESSLY ABOUT ELIMINATING ESSENTIAL PROGRAMS.
THE NEWS MEDIA SHOULD BE ASKING THESE PEOPLE WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING BIG GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS THEY WOULD DROP: THE ARMY, THE NAVY, THE AIR FORCE, THE MARINE CORPS, THE COAST GUARD, THE CIA, THE SECRET SERVICE, THE FBI, HOMELAND SECURITY, THE FDA, THE FAA, OTHER DEPARTMENTS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, THE SUPREME COURT, ALL THE FEDERAL COURTS, THE INTERSTATE AND U.S. HIGHWAY SYSTEMS, THE POST OFFICE, MEDICARE AND MEDICAID, SOCIAL SECURITY, IRS, PUBLIC EDUCATION, AND THE HUNDREDS OF OTHER BIG GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS THAT HELP MAKE AMERICA GREAT AND WHICH WE CANNOT DO WITHOUT. AS YOU CAN SEE, BIG GOVERNMENT IS GOOD FOR THE COUNTRY, NOT THE EVIL PORTRAYED BY IGNORANT PEOPLE.

internetfreepress.com

Article 1 - The Legislative Branch
Section 8 - Powers of CongressThe Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

To borrow money on the credit of the United States;

To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;

To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;

To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;

To establish Post Offices and post roads;

To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

To constitute Tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court;

To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations;

To declare War, grant letters of marque and reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

To provide and maintain a Navy;

To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings; And

To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT NEEDS TO CREATE SOME NEW MONEY, AND GIVE IT TO THE STATES SO THEY CAN BALANCE THEIR BUDGETS.
The states gave up their right to create money when they joined the Union. Article 1, Section 8, of the Constitution gives Congress the right to create money. Why is the News Media so dumb?
Have they never read Article 1, Section 8,of the Constitution!

The Federal Reserve is inadequate for keeping a balanced money supply which is the
cause for this recession. The Federal Reserve was created in 1913 as a bank for banks.
That is what it is. We need to reform the Federal Federal Reserve.

BUILD THE ELECTRICAL GRID ALONG THE INTERSTATE HIGHWAY
Since the Government already owns the interstate highway system and a lot of land along side of the interstate highway system, and
since the utilities own the present grid and the land and new land would have to be acquired-- which would take a lot of time and cost
a lot money, it only makes sense to use the interstate highway system. The interstate highway route is already laid out perfect for a
future electrical grid. What is wrong with having a public back-up system?

WHY ARE THE NEWS MEDIA, REPUBLICANS AND THE TEA PARTY SO STUPID? THEY BELIEVE THAT THE ECONOMIC ASSETS 0F
AMERICA GO BACK TO ZERO AT THE END OF EACH YEAR? THE ECONOMIC ASSETS OF THE USA ECONOMY CONSIST OF MORE
THAN ONE YEAR OF GDP. 14.6 TRILLION TIMES 14.6 TRILLION EQUALS 213 TRILLION DOLLARS. All the tires on 18 wheelers do not run off the interstate at mid-night
and wheel-barrows still work on January 1 of the new year. Several bottles of beer have been flushed through kidneys that don't count any more, but cars and washing machines and still part of the total economic assets of the American economy. How can
any one group of people be so dumb, and still think they are so smart? I tried to get God to come on the internetfreepress.com, but he wouldn't . I ask the Devil, and he said, "these are my dumb people, and I want to keep them that way."

FRANKLIN GRAHAM AND HIS FATHER ARE BOTH NEVER CONFESSED REPUBLICANS.

THE ECONOMIC ASSETS OF AMERICA ARE MORE THAN JUST ONE YEAR OF GDP. 14.6 TRILLION X 14.6 TRILLION =213 TRILLION

CNBC AND FOX NEWS ARE CONTROLLED BY THE REPUBLICAN PARTY

ECONOMICS 101 NEEDS TO BE REPLACED WITH NATURE'S BASIC LAW OF ECONOMICS

THE FREE MARKET UNCONTROLLED CAPITALIST OF WALL STREET THINK THAT THEY HAVE
NO RESPONSIBILITY TO CREATE JOBS WITH MONEY THEY HAVE HOARD. Wal-mart has over a
million men and women who sweat their bubs and balls of every day making Wal-mart what it is, but how
many of these people are free market caitalist? There may be a dozen. The Constitution does not have one word
calling for an Uncontrolled Free Market Capitalist System, but it does call for a controlled system of
Mixturism: business and government working together to meet the needs and desires of all the people.

THERE ARE NO WORDS IN THE CONSTITUTION THAT GIVES THE BANKING INDUSTRY THE
RIGHT TO SKIM THE CREAM OFF OF ALL MONEY MILK! THE TREASURY DEPARTMENT NEEDS
TO BY-PASS THE BANKING INDUSTRY AND PUT NEW MONEY WHEREVER NEEDED.

ALL UNFUNDED MANDATES TO THE STATES SHOULD BE FUNDED WITH NEW MONEY
ARTICLE 1, SECTION 8. OF CONSTITUTION: COIN MONEY AND REGULATE THE VALUE THEREOF.

FIX FANNIE AND FREDDIE WITH NEW MONEY, NOT BORROWED OR TAXPAYERS!
ARTICLE 1, SECTION 8. OF CONSTITUTION: COIN MONEY AND REGULATE THE VALUE THEREOF.

SAVE FANNIE MAE AND FREDDY MAC SO THEY CAN MAKE MORE PRIME SUB LOANS
AND GET MORE PEOPLE IN GOOD HOUSING. We should not lose track that the houses built are
still there and have real value. Contractors made millions, millions of people had jobs and bought millions
of goods and services. Money is the medium of exchange which the Government can create plenty. Goods
and service have real value. The Government should make loans directly to people who earn less than $15 per hour to buy houses.

RELIGION AND TAXATION
If the majority of republicans are opposed to Muslims building a mosque at ground zero in New York, Why are these
people not against the IRS allowing charitable deductions to religion? Is this not making people who do not believe in religion
pay more taxes because of deduction? Does this not run up the National Debt? Does this not violate the First Amendment of the
Constitution, which states: Congress shall make no laws respecting an establishment of religion. If religion doesn't have to pay its
fair share of taxes, what is it? I am not against deductions for religion, just hypocrisy! If republicans want to pay for unemployment
benefits, they could stop deductions for religion. The National Debt is not necessary. We dont't need to borrow money from China
when we have the Constitutional authority to create all the money needed: coin money and regulate the value thereof. By-pass the
inadequate Federal Reserve Banking System and let the Treasure Department make loans directly wherever needed.

What do the whinners of Wall Street want now?
The wind seems to blow in a differnt direction every day for the managers of
of the gambling casinoes of wall street. Shouldn't earnings and potential earnings
determine whether a stock goes up or down? Wall Street should be labeled for
what it is. Over 31 million businesses filed a tax return with the IRS 2009. Why
should we give a devil damn about what only about 10,000 public corporations
are do every day on wall street? Just a lot of hype for the gamblers! All the cute
people on CNBC (General Electric Channel) rolling the dice. Is the earnings of a
stock changed by what the jobs report is today? Why all the hype? Why shouldn't
the clowns of Wall Street just be something to laugh at?

UNEMPLOYED PEOPLE SHOULD BE PAID UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS AS LONG AS THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATE IS ABOVE 5%
IF FOREVER!

JUST SAY NO TO REPUBLICANS IN NOVEMBER!
A parrot can be taught to say, 'polly wants a cracker'- that is three words
more than a republican can say. All a republican can say is no! It seems
that republican politicians have no shame! It is alright to be a republican, but
don't vote for one unless you make over $250,000 a year, hard hearted, and
indifferent to the sufferings of others. Those are the only people republicans
represent! I was once a republican, but I got religion at a Free Will Baptist; and
found that being a Christian was incompatible with being a republican. I changed
to a liberal with a big L, and I've been happy ever since because I know that if
there is a hell, I will miss it since my mind is now free to think and care about others.
----

SEC should investigate Stock Counterfeiting of the 30 Dow Jones Corporations.
Since you can buy stock directly from these coporations as well as on the stock exchange, they need to be constantly checked on.
The Secert Service checks on the counterfeiting of the paper money at every check-out lane. When did the
SEC check on the last Wall Street Corporations for stock counterfeiting? Dow Jones stocks are 3 M, Alcoa,
American Express, AT&T, Bank of America, Boeing, Caterpillar, Chevron Corporation, Cisco System,Coca-Cola,
DuPont, Exxon Mobile, Hewlett-Packard,Home Depot, Intel, IBM, Johnson and Johnson, JP Morgan Chase,Kraft,
McDonald's, Merk, Microsoft, Pfizer, Proctor & Gamble, Travelers, United Technologies, Verizon,Wal-Mart,
and Walt Disney. The Stock Market is a fraud, and a gambling casino. If corporations sold only common stock
and the person who bought it was buying a percentage of the corporation-that would be great. But there is
preferred stock,issuing of more stock, counterfeiting of stock for insiders,and subsidiaries that dilutes
the share of stock which keep the buyer from getting what he or she thinks they are buying. All one needs to do is
watch the tug-of-war that goes on between the bulls and bears on CNBC every day. The pitch men and women of CNBC
with their hype and talking to republicans extolling uncontrolled free market capitalism. The mindless,talking heads
of CNBC Wall Street Channel spend all day knocking everything except free market uncontrolled capitalism. They think they
know so much, but don't! What ever happened to equal time. No where in the Constitution does it call for an uncotrolled,
free market capitalism system;it calls for a system of Mixturism. The big traders of Wall Street sucker the little investor
into the market in the morning and dump them before the market close--and then finishes them off in after hours trading
and before hours trading. This channel which is owned by General Electric Corp.depicts the full show of insider trading.
All of these big traders have become day traders. Where is the SEC?

REVERSE MORTGAGE IS IT A BAD DEAL?
Just because they are advertised by former Senator of Tennessee (R)Fred Thompson
or has been actor like Robert Wagner doesn't make it a good deal! They get paid for telling lies.

.
AARP: Who gets the money from dues and endorsements? Couldn't it do more?

When will the News Media discuss this important issue? NATIONAL DEBT IS NOT YOURS OR YOUR CHILDREN OR YOUR GRANDCHILDREN
The Republican Party would be dead in the water if it didn't have this dead horse to beat. See full article below.

How is the Governor of Arizona and the Second Amendment to the Constitution related? When the Second Amendment was proposed in 1789, there was a good reason. The states did not believe the new Federal Government would be powerful enough to defend the states from invasion from other countries. They wanted their own militia for self defence. If Governor Jan Brewer's National Guard is not powerful enough to stop people from crossing the border of Arizona, the Federal Government should send the Army. But the Constitution gives immigration policy making to the Congress. The Congress should get off of its ass and get the job done now! Read more internetfreepress.

LET THE BUSH TAX CUTS EXPIRE. TAKE THE MONEY AWAY FROM THE CORPORATIONS OF WALL STREET WHO ARE HOLDING IT IN CYBER
SPACE WHEN THEY SHOULD BE HIRING PEOPLE TO WORK WHICH WOULD GROW THEIR BUSINESSES. THEY BRAG EVERY DAY ON THE CNBC
CHANNEL ABOUT ALL THE MONEY THEY HAVE UNDER THE MATTRESS. THEY SHOULD GIVE THE MONEY TO THE STOCK HOLDERS OR SPEND
IT. THE DEVIL DAMN BIG CORPORATIONS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT. THE ECONOMY IS CONSUMER DRIVEN. TAKE
THE MONEY FROM THE RICH AND GIVE IT TO THE POOR; THEY WILL SPEND IT, AND THE RICH WILL GET IT BACK! THEY HAVE STOPPED THE
BUCK. ONE WAY TO TURN IT LOOSE IS TO LET THE BUSH TAX CUTS EXPIRE. BIG CORPORATIONS MOPPED UP THE STIMULUS MONEY AND
PUT IT UNDER THE MATTRESS. TURN THE BUCK LOOSE, AND LET IT DO ITS JOB BY EXCHANGING GOOD AND SERVICES. WE NEED TO THROW
ECONOMICS 101 OUT THE WINDOW AND ADOPT NATURE'S BASIC LAW OF ECONOMICS. It's time for big corporations to be good Americans and stop
hoarding the money supply!

PRESIDENT OBAMA IS DOING A GREAT JOB. WE NEED TO GIVE HIM MORE DEMOCRATS IN NOVEMBER!
Why can't the News Media rub its belly and pat its head at the same time, or will they use any excuse to keep from giving Obama his dues? THE LIFE BLOOD
OF THE NEWS MEDIA IS ADVERTISING; IT IS OWNED LOCK, STOCK AND BARREL BY BIG BUSINESS.

Now is the time for all Liberals to come to the aid of the Democratic Party. I am a Liberal with a big L. I did not get everything I wanted!
But I am not stupid enough to believe that electing more Republicans will help the Liberal Cause! We need to kill the myth of off year
elections by winning 20 more seats in the House and 4 more seats in the Senate. The Republicans have all joined the Tea Party.We can
beat hell out of the Republicans and dump them and the Tea Party into the Boston Harbor. Stop the negative talk and get to work! The
American people are sick of the Tea Party. It didn't have much tea in the bag in the beginning and much less now. The American people
will have their head screwed on straight come November. The Tea Republicans Party has had its run in the News Media and the polls.

The way to pay for unemployment benefits is with new money. Has the News Media and members of Congress never
read Article 1, Section 8, of the Constitution? If they have, surely they would know that Congress has three ways to pay
for the benefits: TAXES, BORROWED MONEY, AND NEW MONEY.

Why does BP want to kill the well? They are going to get the oil, yes. Why not take the oil from the cap they have on the well?
By using a second well, they can get the oil faster!

Make BP open up the cap long enough to pump oil to the tanker to find out for sure what they have been pouring into the Gulf. They say the take-away capacity is greater than the amount of oil coming out
of the well. They would like for the Federal Government not to know for sure. Let us find out before they kill the well. It is possible that they will drill a smaller hole into the old well.

Make BP and the other big oil companies have at least two ways each to stop similar leaks before oil drilling
off shore is resumed. President Obama kicked BP'S ass and made them put 20 billion dollars in a fund over republican
objections We need to put BP'S balls in a vice until everyone gets paid!

UNEMPLOYMENT AND KEEPING YOUR JOB WILL BE THE ISSUE IN NOVEMBER
Every unemployed person knows two things: republicans will not create any jobs and that
republicans will cut out their unemployment benefits. The unemployed is not that stupid!
Why would even an unemployed independent or republican be dumb enough to vote for a republican?
Will rich republicans be secure in their rich neighborhoods if they block unemployment benefits for the unemployed?
HOW SECURE ARE ANY OF US IF WE HAVE MILLIONS OF PEOPLE WHO CAN'T PUT BREAD ON THE TABLE?
The Congres has the Constitutional authorty to create the new money needed to put all the unemployed people back to work.
Article 1, Section 8, of the Constitution.

By-pass the banking industry and make loans directly to small businesses. New programs should be funded with new money, not from borrowed money or from taxes. This
will not devalue the money.What devalues money is when you have people unemployed that could be producing a good or service which has real value.When will the World
realize that money is the medium of exchange?
KEEP YOUR JOB! If you want to join the ranks of the unemployed, vote republican in November. The deficit and the national debt is not the issue. If you work for a living and don't know which political part is on your side, get your head examined!

----------------

REFORM THE FEDERAL RESERVE
"Feds raise interest rates... again!" Headlines like this appeared in the nation's newspapers on many occasions in recent years, and beneath those forbidding tidings, a story invariably reading the same. "The Federal Reserve, anticipating a new round of inflation, put the brakes on the economy today by boosting the rates member banks must pay to borrow money"...or words to that effect.
But reading the story beneath the banner doesn't reveal the complete picture. One must read between the lines and then do some critical thinking to see through a veil of confusion. For example, many economists commonly hold the misconception that inflation is an inherent built-in defect, an inescapable feature of our economy. That is, it is something we just have to live with. These same individuals would have you believe that inflation is caused by an imbalance between the supply of goods and services and the amount of money in circulation. Nothing could be farther from the truth. As previously noted, inflation is caused by one simple factor...human greed, the desire to gain the most benefit from the least effort. In the business community, this drive manifests itself in arbitrary and simultaneous price increases--and, as we'll see, the Federal Reserve aids and abets these acts.
So that we may form objective opinions on this issue, let's first look closely at this body and its method of operation. Exactly what is the Federal Reserve? Who owns it? What's its real purpose? How does its decision-making affect the average consumer? Are its actions based on sound economic principles? Is it playing a numbers game with the American people? And, perhaps most important, is it truly an independent agency?
The Federal Reserve is controlled by a central board of governors. It acts as a central bank of the United States. It was created in 1913 by the assimilation of the country's national banks after their failure. One of its provisions states that all national banks must belong to the Federal Reserve. At its inception, the Federal Reserve was charged with supervising the nation's money supply for the purpose of bringing about economic stability. Unlike commercial banks, though, it was to have no direct contact with private citizens. Rather the central bank was to serve as a "bankers' bank." As such, it maintained on reserve the deposits of member commercial banks and acted as a checking account for the operation of the national government. The Federal Reserve also was given the power to regulate the country's money supply by issuing currency and making loans out of the funds deposited by its member banks and by buying and selling precious metals and foreign currencies, thus influencing the value of the dollar on the international market.
Here's how it is organized. The Federal Reserve is comprised of 12 "so-called" independent and privately controlled main banks, plus 35 or so branch banks. However, it is important to recognize that these banks are independent in name only. Stock in these institutions is wholly owned by commercial banks themselves. So how could they possibly be autonomous, truly independent of influence by the banking industry? It's a fact: Banks throughout the country exert enormously powerful leverage and authority over these 12 institutions, influencing monetary policies that practically guarantee handsome returns on their investments. This is an example of flagrant conflict of interest.
The 12 banks are located in Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Cleveland, Dallas, Kansas City, Minneapolis, New York City, Philadelphia, Richmond, St. Louis, and San Francisco and are regulated by a board of seven governors, headquartered in Washington. These individuals are appointed by the President and, after Senate confirmation, assume their positions for 14 years. They may not be removed. Heading the board of governors is the chairman. Joining the seven governors of the board, are five presidents of Federal Reserve banks. Together, these 12 individuals make up the open-market committee, a group often referred to as the country's monetary authority...and for good reason. They make the critical decisions affecting the national banks and hence the national economy.
But what are the mechanics of the Federal Reserve System? How do its policies impact the economy? All banks in the system are required to make noninterest-bearing deposits to the central bank. The amount of each bank's deposit is calculated as a percentage of their transaction balance. One of the methods of controlling monetary policy, and indeed the supply of available money, is to require the banks to increase the size of their deposit. This has the effect of reducing the amount of currency available to the general public.
The open-market committee controls the quantity of money by authorizing the sale or purchase of U.S government securities on the open market. If the group deems that money should be removed from the banking system, it sells these securities. The money paid to the central bank for the securities is no longer available to member banks or their customers. When the committee wants to increase the money supply, it buys securities, issuing checks for their purchase. This bolsters the reserves and money supply of the banks and makes more money available to consumers.
Another method used by the Federal Reserve to control the money supply is the discount rate. That's the interest rate it charges member banks for loans, money they use for their operations. In theory, low interest rates to banks are passed on to consumers. Low interest rates to consumers generally have a stimulating effect on the economy. If fewer dollars have to be paid for interest, then developers, builders, entrepreneurs and private citizens should have more money to spend on goods and services. That translates into more jobs in most every segment of the economy. Low interest rates would appear to be beneficial to almost everyone except perhaps the lending institutions or the person who depends on savings investments for an income.
But the Federal Reserve becomes anxious when rates are low and employment, production and retail sales are up. Why? They view these conditions as harbingers of impending inflation. They subscribe to the theory that with more money to spend, demand for goods and services will be greater, putting pressure on prices to increase. But is that a realistic assessment? To answer this question, first consider who would benefit most from higher interest rates? It's most certainly not the consumer. If businessmen must pay more for loans to help finance the operation and expansion of their companies, they are forced to pass their increased overhead on to their customers in the form of higher prices. If developers must pay more for loans, they must pass along higher expenses to the consumer in the form of more costly housing and construction. If house payments for millions of families increase by $200-$400 per month, these folks have less to spend on other items. And if consumers spend less on manufactured goods and services, employers supplying these must reduce their work force, eliminating thousands of jobs.
It seems more reasonable to assume that, when the Federal Reserve arbitrarily increases rates and member banks simultaneously follow suit, the stage is set for a major inflationary spiral. Higher rates don't neutralize inflation. They exacerbate it. At the same time, large numbers of jobs are lost and the standard of living for millions of working families decline. And while the Federal Reserve is raising interest rates to supposedly curb inflation and dampen the economy, other members of the government are calling for tax cuts to stimulate spending--a contradictory policy which dramatically underscores the fallacy of the Federal Reserves' premise.
Obviously, the consumer isn't the beneficiary of higher interest rates. But who is? We don't have to search too long and hard for that answer. It can only be the ones who receive the interest payments on the higher-priced loans...the banks.
Now, remember who makes up the Federal Reserve board. Recall it's comprised of seven governors appointed by the President and five other individuals on the board who are actually the presidents of five Federal Reserve banks. These 12 members have the power to arbitrarily increase the cost of borrowed money, and surely they have every incentive to do so. Even a rise of 0.5% opens the floodgates and funnels billions of additional dollars into the vaults of the institutions these policy makers head...billions of dollars removed from the pockets of consumers. And speaking of percentages, doesn't the Federal Reserve play a numbers game with the public? For instance, let's say the Federal Reserve states that it raised interest rates 0.75%, from 4.75 to 5.5%. True enough, that amounts to a difference of 0.75% , but it's dishonest to call that a 0.75% increase. More correctly, a 0.75% increase represents a percentage rise of 16%, because the number 5.5 is actually 16% bigger than 4.75. To see this for yourself, just divide 5.50 by 4.75 to get 1.16, a 16% increase. We'll look at this more closely later.
By increasing interest rates, the banking industry creates for itself what has been called windfall profits. We prefer to describe them as an avalanche of excess, for the profits aren't a one-time event. The extra dollars continue to flow into the banks indefinitely as long as the higher rates are in effect.
So the banking industry has an ideal arrangement. The presidents of the Federal Reserve Banks are also members of the Federal Reserve board's open-market committee, which is able to dictate monetary policy. The commercial banks who own all stock in the 12 Federal Reserve banks are in the position to reap the profits. Now if you were in such an advantageous position to increase your income by voting to raise rates, would you be tempted?
The original purpose in establishing the Federal Reserve System was to provide a means of distributing money in a way to keep a balanced money supply. But Congress was deceived into believing the Federal Reserve would be independent of the banking industry. However, its charter by no means precluded close association with the banks. So today we find the board being completly dominated by banking industry interests and totally isolating the American people and the government of elected officals from having any say in this one industry which controls the lifeblood of all businesses in America. We must therefore suspect the Federal Reserve's self-serving actions and be wary of its unchecked power. It is the ultimate example of flagrant conflict of interest. While professing to be watchdogs of our economy, independent of any special interest group, it functions in reality as a price-fixing agency for the banking industry. Using the threat of inflation as an excuse, rather than accepting the real definition of the cause of inflation, the Federal Reserve diverts billions of dollars from the U.S economy into its own coffers. The American people are being duped.
But there is a solution to this problem. First, let's change the composition of the Federal Reserve open-market committee from 12 members to 15 members. We propose giving the people a voice by allowing the House of Representatives the power to appoint one member to the committee, the Senate one member, and the Commerce Department one member. The remaining positions could still be filled by representatives of the reserve banks. Term limits of eight years should be imposed on all open-market committee members.
Second, let's make the open-market committee truly open. All meetings should be accessible to the public through television coverage by C-Span. No longer would the directors and bank presidents be able to formulate policy in private, making decisions that often adversely affect every citizen. Closed-door meetings deny citizens their right to information and policy-making--and, in fact, are a violation of the freedom of information act and contrary to all democratic principles.
Third, let's rigidly define the scope of Federal Reserve activities. The Federal Reserve board (a government agency) should be charged with monitoring the supply of money and economic indicators. Their primary function would be to advise the Treasury Department in regard to regulating the country's money supply. The purpose of such regulation would be to make certain that there is always a balanced supply of money, one equivalent to the ratio of goods and services produced.
To achieve this balance, four approaches are suggested. The first approach would be to put the 12 Federal Reserve banks and their branches under the control of the Treasury Department. The second approach would be to index the tax rate on a scale of 1-10. If the open-market committee and Federal Reserve board determined that there was excess money in relation to the value of the nation's output, tax rates would be adjusted upward toward the maximum rate passed by Congress. This would cause surplus funds to flow from the economy into the government treasury, bringing the money supply into balance. If the board determined, after input from several sources that there was a shortage of currency, tax rates would be lowered. This would allow more money to be left in the consumer's paycheck which then could be spent to fuel the economy. The third approach would be to require the Treasury Department in the event of a money shortage--and after concurrence with the Congress, the Federal Reserve board, and the open-market committee--to authorize the release of additional currency into the general circulation by making up the loss of money due to lowering tax rates. These additional funds would be sufficient ONLY to compensate for temporary losses. Make no mistake! This is NOT advocating the wholesale printing of money. That would result in a catastrophic devaluation of the dollar. However, if the GDP grows by say 2%, there should be an equivalent increase in the money supply. This would make the amount of currency equal to the value of goods and services. The fourth approach would be to require the Treasury Department to implement monetary policy through the exercise of these specific additional duties: Setting the primary discount rate at which the Federal Reserve can borrow money from the Treasury Department; endowing new programs created by the Congress; making direct loans to soft spots in the economy; making direct loans to first-time home owners whose income is below the national average; and making lump sum payments on the national debt.
This restructuring of the system would accomplish two primary objectives: (1) to control the nation's money supply through a balanced input from business, government, the citizenry and the banks so that no one segment of the economy would be able to dictate monetary policy and (2) to maintain a balanced money supply at all times.
Ivory tower economists have long perpetuated the theory, really the myth, that inflation is caused by too many dollars chasing too few goods, by very low unemployment rates, or by deficit spending. But we repeat that the simple truth is that inflation is caused by nothing more than greed. Producers and manufacturers of goods and services stand poised and ready to make windfall profits any time they can arbitrarily and simultaneously increase their prices without incurring an increase in the cost of their operation. Some do exactly that, and they reap excessive profits, stealing money out of everyone's pockets. Indeed, inflation is truly a euphemism for theft. As we've seen a prime example of thievery, disguised as inflation, can be found in large companies producing the same product simultaneously in lockstep raising their prices to customers. This arbitrary action brings to mind a number of disturbing questions: How can suppliers raise prices so easily in unison... in concert with one another? Isn't this collusion...conspiracy? If so, why are these companies not investigated for price-fixing under the Sherman Anti-Trust Act? Where is our Justice Department? Did these companies increase prices because they suffered an increase in their cost of labor or raw products? Or did they simply jump prices because they deemed the psychological climate--created by the Federal Reserve and the open-market committee whom no one voted for--was right?
To answer this question, these companies were poised, lying in wait, ready for some agency or body to provide them with an excuse to ask for more money. And sadly, the Federal Reserve came to their aid. It's interesting that price hikes often coincide with the increases in interest rates imposed by the Federal Reserve board. This is not an uncommon scenario. By raising interest rates, the Federal Reserve bank all too often provides many in the business community with just the reason they need to justify, in their own minds, price hikes of their own. Much of the inflationary spiral is born on the steps of the Federal Reserve.

How to Solve the Problem of Unemployment

The waste of human resources on welfare and unemployment must end by creating a reserve-retraining work force, making employment available to everyone. If it makes sense to have a reserve backup force for the military, it also makes sense to have a reserve backup for the civilian work force. No longer would any person be unemployed except on a voluntary basis if a reserve-retraining work force were created so that people could always be working or training.

This group of disenfranchised people, the unemployed, represent a large, diverse segment of our population, including not only single parents and inner-city teenagers, but also people with families who have recently been laid off from good jobs and who realize they must acquire new career skills to support their families.

Almost every town in this country has an employment security office, whose purpose is to match the unemployed with appropriate work. A noble effort, but of little benefit to the millions who lack skills and training that would qualify them for decent paying jobs. But the employment security offices could be the doorway for a reserve-retraining work force. The reserve-retraining work force would do more than maintain meaningless job listings for people who can’t fill them. Through this initiative, the mission of the old employment security agencies would be dramatically changed. They would be transformed into centers for the redirection of lives. People could report to these offices and be assigned to training courses in the public or private educational systems to learn new jobs; or they could serve as a backup work force for people taking vacations, sick leave, or leave to look after family members who are sick. Employers would have a ready source of people for new jobs—or to fill in for one day, one week or one month, while a regular employee is absent.

By giving people on-the-job training, every job could be learned by someone who would be ready when needed in the regular work force. The nation would have a large pool of workers qualified to perform a wide variety of jobs. On call for temporary work assignments or permanent positions, these retrained millions would form a cadre of workers, a reserve to bolster our nation’s labor force—ready and qualified to step in at a moment’s notice. No longer would the operation of small and large employers alike be compromised and threatened by the temporary absence or the permanent loss of any personnel.

Child-care centers could be established in conjunction with the reserve-retraining work force—staffed by competent people needing work—to care for dependents of trainees and others who work through the reserve-retraining work force. These could be operated on a 24-hour, 7-days-a-week basis.

With the establishment of the reserve-retraining work force and child-care centers, no longer would any individual be able to honestly lament that they were powerless to improve, to earn a paycheck, or to become productive. There should be virtually no excuse for unemployment. By supplying trained personnel, no job should remain unfilled. No worker should remain idle. With all able-bodied individuals earning an income, the need for welfare payments would be all but eliminated. Those certified to be truly unemployable because of physical or mental impairment would still receive income from the government. Those able-bodied individuals who refuse to be retrained or to work afterwards would receive no further government assistance. The door of the reserve-retraining work force would always be open, where one can get a day's pay for a day's work.

How would we pay for this new approach to helping those who help themselves? The money now being spent on a host of dead-end welfare programs and unemployment compensation, paid by employers, could be diverted to the start-up and support of this effort. Employers would benefit by having a supply of pretrained workers. Eventually, as increasing numbers of individuals receive training, obtain jobs, leave the welfare rolls, and begin earning salaries and paying taxes, cash flow would reverse. The program would actually save the government more money than it costs. We would see the reserve-retraining work force program starting to pay divid-ends…dividends that not only affect the bottom line but, more importantly, the human spirit as well.

A basic premise: Since earning a living is a person’s first requirement in life, this need must be met before one can realize social and intellectual potential. Any government that does not provide a means by which all of its citizens can partake completely in society has more of which to be ashamed than proud.

Individually, a person, a company, or a corporation cannot provide a job for every citizen at all times; but together they can. The injustice of unemployment cannot wait for better economic times. Passage of time does not solve problems; only people can solve problems. The solution to the unemployment problem is long overdue.

For people who are employed to allow the government not to become the “employer of last resort” without strong protest loses any legitimate claim they may have as part of society. To say that anyone who wants a job can find one without establishing a system to accomplish it is an excuse for the inexcusable.

When America establishes a reserve-retraining work force so all of the people can have a job all of the time, the country will be in a position to eliminate many injustices. Once the injustice of unemployment has been corrected, America can then see clearly how to correct all other existing injustices. Furthermore, America will also be able to correct new injustices as they arise.

For any country, much less America, to have an office of Employment Security where people receive unemployment checks for a few weeks and then continue to be unemployed without a check is a result of the poverty of the minds of government leaders. For 95% of those who are employed to work any overtime without protesting while 5% of their fellow persons go unemployed demonstrates a lack of care.

All the people in society, collectively through their government, have sufficient resources to be the employer of last resort. To place people on welfare or give handouts rather than establish a system that will provide a job for anyone desiring one is unforgivable.

For labor unions to have a system by which people retain their jobs simply due to seniority, while those of shorter employment lose all, is not justice. All employees should share in the percentage of loss. If a set number of employees can work overtime when there is more work, all the employees should work less when there is less work.

How in good conscience can those of us who share the wealth of the richest, most powerful, innovative nation on earth be content while millions of our fellow citizens live in poverty, trapped in the welfare cycle? A reserve-retraining work force is the answer to unemployment and welfare. More than enough money is already being spent on unemployment compensation and welfare benefits to pay for it.

How is the Governor of Arizona and the Second Amendment to the Constitution related? When the Second Amendment was proposed in 1789, there
was a good reason. The states did not believe the new Federal Government would be powerful enough to defend the states from invasion from other
countries. They wanted their own militia for self defence. If Governor Jan Brewer's National Guard is not powerful enough to stop people from crossing
the border of Arizona, the Federal Government should send the Army. But the Constitution gives immigration policy making to the Congress. The Congress
should get off of its devil damn ass and get the job done now!

THE SECOND AMENDMENT MAY GIVE A PERSON THE RIGHT TO OWN A GUN, BUT ARTICLE 1 OF THE CONSTITUTION GIVES THE CONGRESS THE LATITUDE
NEEDED TO DETERMINE WHAT KIND OF GUN AND REGULATIONS NEEDED TO CONTROL IT. IT IS TIME TO DROP THE ARGUMENT ABOUT THE
RIGHT TO OWN A GUN AND ASK CONGRESS TO DO ITS JOB.

---------------

An elementary, basic concept to be sure, but one which seems all too often to be forgotten by the average citizen…and politicians. After all, in this country, it’s easy to forget that money is nothing more than paper and ink or small, round pieces of metal. Why? Here, shortages of most services and products are rare. As a result, money may be used readily and almost immediately to satisfy whatever we desire. Money, therefore, assumes an importance all its own...itself quickly becoming the object of desire. Is it any wonder then that many people become confused? So close is the association of money with personal gratification that some begin to think of money as having inherent worth, as a commodity to be treasured for its own sake. Rather than viewing money as simply a medium of exchange, they cherish cash, hold big bank accounts in high esteem, and hoard huge investments of stocks and bonds.

Some say this false attribution of value to money and its adulation is behavior akin to worship, and perhaps such an attitude would be harmless were it not for the fact that this kind of thinking distorts reason, engenders false premises and retards real prosperity for all.

When we perceive money as a commodity with intrinsic value instead of as an exchange medium, we often become quite possessive… retentive. We develop a self-centered, self-serving posture which narrows our view. We develop blinders which prevent us from realizing that ours is an interdependent society and that much of our personal success has been due to efforts of countless others. Perhaps we even fail to recognize that the thousands of items we all use each day are produced by individuals who each make their own small but important contribution to the economy.

This rather constricted view of our society and of the inaccurate sentiment with regard to the nature of money serves as a barrier for greater economic prosperity for all in two fundamental ways. First, it promotes the belief that money is sacrosanct, and that leads to an inflexible monetary policy toward solving economic problems. Second, this limiting viewpoint leads to the fallacious idea that each person is independent, with little obligation to participate in a cooperative effort.

For example, many accept economic ills such as recession, depression, and inflation as inevitable weaknesses in our free-enterprise system, conceding that there is no way to prevent these dilemmas. But could it be that these problems continue to vex us, in part, because of our preoccupation with money as a commodity rather than as a medium of exchange? Could it be that this preoccupation, this obsession, prevents us from attempting more imaginative, even unorthodox, approaches? Perhaps we should break from our preconceived notions and courageously embrace the idea that money is nothing more than an exchange medium, remembering what Adam Smith, the father of capitalism, exhorted: that “the real wealth of a nation is not the gold and silver laid up in its treasury, but the goods and services that its people produce and are able to enjoy.” Accepting this innovative outlook will open up new vistas for solving economic woes.

Here are some specifics. Inflation, in reality, is a euphemism for theft, resulting from the simultaneous and arbitrary increase in prices by producers of goods and services. Producers generally incur no increases in the cost of their production, so they automatically reap large windfall profits from the hikes they impose on their customers. To counter this unreasonable practice, we propose a bold remedy...the establishment of a board of monitors to evaluate price hikes of major producers and manufacturers. These monitors would be comprised of a small group of individuals who would determine whether price increases were justified. This board would also periodically publish a “fair-price” list for the benefit of the consumer. Producers would be encouraged to increase profits by increasing production, not by hiking prices. Those who venerate money as a commodity may be skeptical, seeing this plan as a departure from the old school. They may contend that inflation has a more academic cause, blindly accepting the old line of the so-called academic experts, who routinely continue to spout the same propaganda over and over: “Inflation is caused by too many dollars chasing too few goods or by deficit government spending.” They don't see that the real cause of inflation is simple unadulterated greed. It and it alone fuels the fires of inflation. It is not apparent to these people that some restraint must be applied to the greedy. The theorists are fearful of tampering with the law of supply and demand, insisting these two factors along with competition are sufficient for holding prices down. They don’t understand a fundamental truth: that because of price-fixing and price-gouging, true competition does not even exist.

So implementation of a price-monitoring board will help keep inflation in check; but, to counter inflation that has already occurred, we propose that the supply of circulating money be adjusted. Let us say, for example, there is a 1% rise in the cost of goods and services. In a $14 trillion economy, that’s equal to a $140 billion decrease in the supply of money…$140 billion dollars worth of goods and services which cannot be exchanged, or bought. We suggest replacing that missing $140 billion with new money. This will restore the balance between the money supply and the supply of available goods and services, enabling consumers to continue buying and saving the jobs of millions of workers.

Traditionalists may disagree. But remember we are only suggesting a restoration of monetary balance, not a wholesale printing of money. Once again a courageous pragmatic approach, unencumbered by orthodox ivory-tower theories, is indicated. Let us not forget either that the constitution gives the government the right to create money in an effort to guarantee every citizen the right to a job and adequate standard of living.

Another issue in need of reform is the minimum wage…currently at a rate which ensures that no matter how hard the individual works, abject poverty will be his or her lot. We believe that the minimum wage should be tied to the average national wage…that it should be no less than 15% of congressional salaries which should be frozen until this percentage is reached. The wage disparity in our country must be corrected.

Rejecting the concept of money as a commodity will help us accept a program for eliminating poverty, unemployment and welfare. By instituting a government-financed training program, we will at long last be providing every citizen with a means of earning a day’s pay for a day’s work. Those displaced from their old jobs by technology or for whatever reason will be retrained so that they may enter the work force again. This project will reduce unemployment, provide employers with a ready-trained work force and lift millions from poverty and the welfare trap. And, as a bonus, there is good reason to believe the crime rate will drop. If each individual has the opportunity to earn an honest living, theft becomes less attractive.

The Federal Reserve system is yet another area ripe for reform. Our antiquated ideas regarding the role of money have allowed this body to become dominated by the banking industry. By acquiescing to the demands of private banks, the members routinely raise interest rates, a major cause of inflation itself. We propose restructuring the Federal Reserve so that it is more responsive to the economic needs of the nation. This can be accomplished by freeing it from the control of the commercial banks. We will look at this in more detail later.

Nature’s Basic Law of Economics states that the real wealth of a nation is measured by the value of goods and services its workers can produce and enjoy from developing natural resources. When we confer a false value upon our exchange medium, money, we become self-centered and fail to realize the interdependent nature of our system. We then inevitably impose artificial constraints and limitations upon our ability to solve problems. This, in turn, prevents us from reaching our greatest potential.

When we embrace Nature’s Basic Law of Economics, we free ourselves of the idea that money has innate value, and we become less concerned about money for money’s sake. We see that the only real wealth are the goods and services produced by labor, the collective sweat of our brows. We see that personal assets are a reality because of our own hard work and because of the interdependent nature of our system and the hard work of countless others. Realizing that we don’t “make it alone,” we may be more willing to abandon the rigid precepts which are based on the false notion of money as a commodity. We may be more willing to consider programs which would help abolish unnecessary economic disasters such as inflation, recession, welfare, unemployment, crime and poverty.

If we stretch our minds enough to accept the fact that money has no worth except as an exchange medium, that we depend on each other for economic survival, and that an individual’s financial well-being is related directly to the well-being of others, then we may even be willing to accommodate a new approach to government.

To reiterate, Nature's Basic Law of Economics teaches: There are only two kinds of resources—people resources and natural resources. All goods and services are produced when people resources work with natural resources. As long as these two resources are available, there is no reason for not producing the goods and services needed and wanted by the people.
inflation: Euphemism for Gouging orTheft

Yes, public education’s record of achievement is testimony to the soundness of the concept. In spite of the fact that they are beset by increasingly difficult problems, our public schools continue to function. But how much longer can they continue to be effective if we refuse to address their problems? Critics constantly remind us of high school graduates who can’t fill out job applications...of 12th graders who can’t solve sixth-grade mathematics problems...and of the millions who never finish their education. These situations are all too real; but are they the result of an inherently flawed system, or are they caused by our failure to make concerted efforts to improve and modernize the existing system? We submit that the latter is the case. The basic concept of public education is far superior on the whole to anything an elitist private educational system provides.

Public education should not be dismantled or even restructured. It only needs to be updated, to be brought into the 21st century, an approach, we believe, that will confront and ultimately solve two of its most pressing problems: (1) lack of teacher support, particularly in providing access to the latest innovations in electronic teaching equipment and methods, and (2) disruptions in the classroom caused by a small number of problem students.

Let’s examine these problems a little more closely. In reference to the first, technologically our approach to instruction is antiquated, having changed little since the one-room schoolhouse days. The teacher of 150 years ago was expected to educate, inspire and perhaps entertain a roomful of students with nothing more than a blackboard, a piece of chalk and a few textbooks, a daunting task even for that time. Walk into the average classroom today and likely you’ll see the teacher struggling to accomplish the same goals with basically the same tools, a near impossible task in today’s techno-environment. Nearly impossible because today’s students have been raised on television and computers. Their expectations and attention spans are geared to electronic media. How can a teacher maintain the interests of students in academics for six hours a day, five days a week, with only chalk and blackboard, given that at home most have the latest in sophisticated electronic gadgetry? How could we possibly expect the teacher to plan and implement an instructional program that could come anywhere close to the sparkling presentations the students are accustomed to seeing elsewhere...single presentations whose production requires the work of an army of professionals. We can’t. It’s far too much for one, an unrealistic demand. The solution is simple. We have to provide the teacher with help...help in the form of instructional media, such as computers, computer software, videotapes, CD-ROMs and any other relevant materials available which concentrate on the specific topics found in textbooks and presented by the teacher. Why shouldn’t we take advantage of the marvels technology has produced to improve our educational program and enhance the effectiveness of our teachers.

Updating our instructional methods will inevitably update the image of the teachers. With these aids, they can become directors of well thought out programs, with ample time to coordinate and plan peripheral activities for student enrichment. Then there would be time to clearly define learning objectives and time to plot a course by which these goals may be reached. Supervisors and administrators should work closely with their teachers in developing and carrying out curriculum objectives, and the federal, state, and local governments should take the lead, providing the necessary funding to ensure that these plans are realized.

The second pressing problem plaguing our public schools, that of disruptions in the classroom, must be addressed. Regardless of the equipment available to the teacher, teaching is impossible when there is constant disruption in the classroom. Most would agree that the teaching of proper conduct should begin in the home. Unfortunately, too many parents lack the skills required to teach their children the importance of good behavior. Others don’t have the time or, sadly, the concern.

To address this problem, we suggest assistance be directed toward the child and the parent. Alternative schools should be established in each area. Uncontrollable students would be removed from the traditional classroom and be required to attend sessions supervised and taught by counsellors specially trained to deal in discipline problems. Psychologists would also be available to help those with emotional and drug-related problems or those with learning disabilities. The goal would be to eventually return the child to the normal classroom setting. But behavior problems are likely to resurface if conflicts at home aren’t resolved. Therefore, we propose counselling services for the parents as well.

The investment in classroom equipment and in the personal services for the wayward is not insignificant. But can we afford to continue as before? One of the most crucially important institutions in our society, our educational system, needs our help. The productive potential of large numbers of people is being ignored. What will these uneducated cost our society? Plenty. As someone once said, “If you think education is expensive, you ought to try ignorance.”

THE PROBLEM WITH PUBLIC EDUCATION IS ADMINISTRATIVE: by JAMES M. CARROLL
The purpose of this book is to show that the major problem with public education is an adminstrative one. All administrators including
the National Department of Education, the State Department of Education, the school board members, the superintendents, the supervisors, and
the school principals do not know what it is they are supposed to be doing. From the beginning of time, all successful people, succcessful enterprises,
etc., have followed three simple steps to success: having an objective, formulating a plan, and implementing action. School administrators violate the first step
which makes it impossible for them to follow the other two steps. They do not have clear-cut objectives, much less a plan that will accomplish the objective when given
action by the teachers. Consequently, every teacher is left to do his or her own thing, rather than follow a successful plan that reaches the objectives.When administrators
at the local level have clear-cut objectives for each course being taught, a proven plan that will reach these objectives, and then see that each teacher is following that plan, the public
will have the kind of educatrional system it wants and is already paying for. With the slip-shod method of teaching without clearly-defined objectives and proper supervision, the public
should be thankful that public education education does the job it is doing. The problems of public education can be solved by simply following the three steps that make anything a
success: objective, plan, action. The modern-day school is satill just a lot of one room schools under one roof, with each "schoolmarm:" doing his or her own thing.
Send ten dollars to 2201 Southern Shade Blvd. Knoxville,Tennesse 37932 Postage an handling is includ
The idea below was presented to BP back in May 2010. BP would be smart now to take the oil away form the cap and put it into oil tanker on the
surface, rather then test the integrity of the pipes. If they do test the integrity of the pipes, they won't have to wait hours to find out the results.
DID BP MAKE A MISTAKE BY NOT DESIGNING THE DOME LIKE A PYRAMID WITH AT LEAST FIVE
TAKE OFF PIPE AT DIFFERENT DEPTHS INSIDE THE PYRAMID? IF IT HAD A WIDE BASE WITH PRONGS
THAT WOULD GO INTO THE GULF FLOOR AND HEAVY ENOUGH, AND PORTS THAT COULD BE OPENED
AND CLOSED SO EQUILIBRIUM COULD BE ESTABLISHED, IT WOULD ALLOW THE GAS AND OIL TO
FLOW OUT THE TAKE OFF PIPES INTO THE TANKERS

To more fully understand this, let's take a realistic look at how stock markets function. The rise and fall of the stock market is essential for the stock market to work at all. If prices continually decline, no one would buy stock. If stock prices continually increase, people would put all their money in the stock market, which would bankrupt the rest of the economy.

The economic effect of the rise and fall of the stock markets is a misconception and is, in fact, just the opposite of what people are told. Most of the hundreds of stocks that are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, NASDAQ and the American Exchange are not new stock issues. Most of them have been on the stock exchanges for years. When a new stock is issued to raise money to start a new company, it has a very positive effect on the economy by creating new jobs which produce more goods and services — the real wealth of a nation. What a stock sells for after the initial sale has no positive effect on the economy unless it sells for less. When the price of old stock drops, it takes fewer dollars to pay for the same stock certificate; therefore making more dollars available to purchase other items. If the price of an old stock goes up, it merely takes more dollars out of the economy to purchase the same stock certificate. This has the same destroying effect on the money supply as inflation.

The up and down cycles of the stock markets are made to work by the people who have seats on the stock exchanges, program buyers, and by institutional managers of many different kinds of pension, money-market , and a host of other funds. These people can make the stock market go up or down by selling or buying big blocks of stocks or by using any kind of psychological or capricious ideas around to justify their actions. Whichever direction the wind blows, the stockbrokers receive their commission. Stockbrokers have the best of both worlds; they get a commission when the stock is purchased and also when the stock is sold. Whether the stock is selling high or low or whether the stockholder is making money or losing money, the commission is still paid.

No one is suggesting that the stock markets should be done away with, but the real role they play in the economy ought to be understood so that their influence on economic stability is lessened. Whether the stock markets are up or down, the thing that should provide for a healthy, growing economy is an adequate money supply…one which can exchange all the goods and services the highly productive American workers produce.

The stock markets are truly legalized gambling for anyone who buys stock hoping that the price will increase so they can cash in their winnings. This legalized gambling is a good thing in a capitalistic system, making it possible for stockholders to become millionaires if they play it right; but the true value of any stock is found in the dividend that it pays per share in company earnings.

So that anyone…not just stockholders…might have the chance to become a millionaire, what is needed in America is a national lottery. Then every American can buy a lottery ticket each week for $5 with a one in a few million chances of becoming a millionaire. If a hundred million dollars is taken in each week, 25%, or $25 million, of the money should be invested in the stock market to help eventually pay off the national debt and the other 75% or $75 million should be given to 75 winners — which would produce 75 new millionaires each week. It could then truly be said that every American who has $5 has a chance to become a millionaire. If we have gambling casinos and the stock markets for the well-off, we should have a national lottery for all people.

The truth of the matter is that the system cannot go broke as long as there is a sufficient number of people working to produce the goods and services necessary to meet the demand of consumers. So long as adequate quantities of goods and services flow from the producers to the consumers, the issue of money supply is a moot point. We should recall that money in and of itself is worthless. Money functions only as a medium for the exchange of goods and services...commodities which do have real, intrinsic and tangible value. If we take care to maintain the equilibrium between the supply of goods and services and their demand, monetary equilibrium will inevitably follow, and the question of a bankrupt Social Security System will become meaningless.

The 21st century will see babyboomers reaching retirement age and changing demographics at a dizzying pace. The ratio of workers producing goods and services to retirees consuming them is steadily decreasing. That has been the trend since social security’s inception. In the 1940’s there were 12 workers for every retiree. Today the worker/retiree ratio is about 3 to 1. By 2010, there will only be two workers for each retiree. As these numbers become reality, our real worry should not be money inflow versus money outflow. Rather we should be concerned with whether there will be sufficient numbers of people in the work force to meet the demand generated by all those who will be consuming...those additional millions of retirees, who fuel the economy with spending but who produce no goods and services themselves. Again, if production and consumption are balanced, the money supply will self-adjust.

But how do we ensure that this equilibrium between production and consumption is sustained? The most obvious way is by keeping more people in the work force for a longer period. One way that may be accomplished is by extending the age of retirement from 65 to 68 or 70. How can we justify advancing the age of retirement, and how would that help alleviate the imbalance? Over the last several decades, medical science has steadily increased the human life span. At the time of social security's inception in the 1930’s, the average worker lived only to age 64; and, with retirement age set at 65, the number of those collecting benefits was relatively low. The surplus grew. But today the demographic picture is much different. The average life span is some 10 years greater. That, of course, translates into more people collecting benefits for a longer period of time. It also means there are many more consumers demanding goods and services...services produced by a shrinking (in relative terms) work force. Keeping individuals in the work force longer will ease pressure on two fronts: It reduces the financial drain on the system, and it ensures that sufficient numbers of workers will continue to produce goods and services to meet the increased demand. Productivity and consumption will once again be in balance.

Additionally, to encourge the elderly to continue working, flexible work schedules, both in hours per day and days per week should be adopted and the cap on earnings should be eliminated. Older workers should be allowed to earn as much as they want without the handicap of having their social security benefits reduced. With this incentive they may continue working for as long as they desire. These two steps, alone, will help maintain a labor supply sufficient for producing the goods and services demanded by increasing numbers of retirees.

To ensure that their later years are even more comfortable, employees should be encouraged early on in their careers to contribute to IRA’s. And employers should be allow to contribute deductible matching funds to the employee accounts. Upon retirement, these funds could be used to supplement social security payments.

The Social Security System trust fund, contrary to popular belief, has amassed a substantial surplus...some one-half trillion dollars to date. This money is not presently being invested so as to produce maximum return. But a portion, say 25%, allocated wisely in a diversified stock portfolio could return enormous revenues to the system with minimal risk. The additional income generated would ensure retirees an even more comfortable and worry-free later life.

Remember, social security is a pay-as-you-go proposition. As long as we make sure that we produce as much we consume, the system will continue to function, working for the next generation... and generations ad infinitum.

You can help produce an instant mindset change in the year 2001 that will bring a lasting era of peace and prosperity by ordering the book MIXTURISM to find and promote the ideas that will rule the 21st century and beyond.

THE WAY TO SAVE CAPITALISM AND PRIVATE ENTERPRISE IS WITH MIXTURISM.
The common sense approach. Businesses and Governments working together to meet the needs and desires of all the people.
America is a republic. A country in which the sovereign power is vested in representatives chosen by the people.
Article 1, Section 8, of the Constitution gives Congress the latitude it needs to provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and
manage a healthy, growing economy at all times. Recession is an excuse for the inexcusable.

JIM CRAMER OF CNBC MAKES A KINDERGRADEN APOLOGY FOR BEING WRONG
ON HIS PREDICTION ON THE STOCK MARKET IF THE HEALTH-CARE BILL PASSED.
SINCE THIS REPUBLICAN IDEOLOGY HAS BEEN ON THE AIR FOR FIVE YEARS, HE
SHOULD MOVE UP TO THE SIX GRADE AND KISS NANCY POLOSI'S DONKEY. HE ISN'T
HALF THE MAN THAT NANCY POLOSI IS A WOMEN, AND HE DOESN'T COME UP TO THE
KNEES OF PRESIDENT OBAMA.
DOESN'T HIS SHOW BORDER ON INSIDER TRADING? WHO CONTROLS HIS CHARITY FUND?
WHO DESIDES WHO GET THE MONEY? EVEN IF HE GIVES IT AWAY, THAT MAKES IT THE
SAME, DOESN'T IT? WHAT ABOUT ALL THE EMPLOYEES OF CNBC WHO KNOW IN ADVANCE
OF WHAT HE IS GOING TO PROMOTE? WHEN DOES HE BUY THE STOCK AND SELL IT FOR HIS CHARITY?
WHEN DO THE EMPLOYEES OF NBC, GENERAL ELECTRIC, AND CNBC BUY AND SELL THEIR STOCK?

JIM CRAMER AND LARRY KUDLOW SHOULD BE PROMOTING FREE AND FAIR MARKET
MIXTURISM: BUSINESSES AND GOVERNMENT WORKING TOGETHER TO MEET THE NEEDS
AND DESIRES OF ALL THE PEOPLE INSTEAD OF PROMOTING DO NOTHING REPUBLICANS AND
FREE MARKET CAPITALISM. THE CONSTITUTION CALLS FOR MIXTURISM.

WHY DOES CNBC DISCLAIM EVERYTHING CRAMER SAYS? DOES CNBC THINK IT EXCUSES THEM
FROM INSIDER TRADING?

THERE IS A NEED FOR SUCH SHOWS ON CNBC STOCK CHANNEL, BUT NOT ANOTHER FOX NEWS TO BASH
OUR GREAT GOVERNMENTS FROM CITY, COUNTY, STATE AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THAT STANDS UP FOR
THE PEOPLE AND THEIR WELFARE. WHEN NINETY-FIVE PERCENT OF THE PEOPLE WORK THEIR BUBS AND BALLS
OFF EVERY DAY FOR THE OTHER FIVE PERCENT WHO CONTROL ALL THE WEALTH, THEY NEED SOMEONE. THEY
NEED BIG GOVERNMENT.

BUSINESSES BRAG EVERY DAY ON THESE SHOWS ABOUT ALL THE MONEY THEY HAVE STORED ON COMPUTER
CHIPS FROM MOVING GOODS AND SERVICES BY HOLDING IT IN RESERVE INSTEAD OF HIRING UNEMPLOYED
PEOPLE. IF 90 % OF THE PEOPLE CAN PRODUCE ALL THE GOODS AND SERVICES NEEDED, WHY NOT LOWER THE
WORK WEEK FROM 40 HOURS TO 36 HOURS?

WHY ARE THE FREE MARKET CAPITALIST SO DUMB?
If the Free Market Capitalist cared about the consumer, instead of raising price-- they
would increase production when there is more demand for their goods. I am not aganist
Free and Fair Market Capitalism. I believe that Business and Government should work
together to meet the needs and desires of all the people. This is what I call Mixturism.

WHEN WILL THE IDIOTS OF WALL STREET REALIZE THAT IT IS GOODS AND
SERVICES THAT HAVE REAL VALUE? BAILOUTS ARE NEEDED TO PUT MORE
MONEY INTO THE ECONOMY? MONEY IS THE MEDIUM OF EXCHANGE. LARRY
KUDLOW OF CNBC IS A PERFECT EXAMPLE OF A PERFECT IDIOT.

The world needs to re-think money by putting it second instead of first. We need to put goods and
services first and money second.. Goods and services is what has real value. Money is the medium
of exchange. The financial markets in America and now Europe ought to be proff enough that Central
Banks have to create more money as goods and services increase. Only Central Governments have the
control of the money supply and have a responsibility to be sure there is an adequate supply at all time.
The first paragraph of economics 101 should state: There are only two kinds of resources--people resources
and natural resources. All goods and services are produced when people resources work with natural resources.
As long as these two resources are available, there is no reason for not producing the goods and services needed
and wanted by the people. Money can be created when needed. Article 1, Section 8, of the Constitution gives
the Federal Government of the USA all the power it needs to keep a balanced money supply at all times.
THANKS TO NATURE FOR BAILOUTS!!!

THE WAY TO HANDLE THE AFTERMATH OF TERRORISM AND NATURAL DISASTERS
We need a National Disaster Insurance Policy by the Federal Government that will replace one on one
all the damage caused by a natural disaster or terrorism,Then we need to quickly clean up all the mess
and then move on. It will happen again and again. We can not and should not change who we are .We
are a FREE PEOPLE where the individual, in the mist of 300 million people, is a person with full rights
as granted by our great Constitution. That is is what our military and police men and women die for
every day. CLEAN UP THE MESS, REPLACE IT, AND MOVE ON.

WELCOME TO MODERATE AND LIBERAL REPUBLICANS TO THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Moderate and liberal republicans will never find any comfort in the Republican Party. The Party wants
only people who do not think, and who want to keep things as is. Let the right wing and the Tea Party
have the Republican Party. The Democratic Party is not liberal enough; moderate and liberal republicans
will find comfort.

"DRILL BABY DRILL"!!
Where is Lary Kudlow of CNBC, General Electric, the Republicans, the Tea Party, Sarah
Palin, BP Oil, Wall Street, and the Free Market Capitalist? Will this crew clean up the Gulf Oil Spill?
"DRILL,BABY,DRILL" All the Free Market Capitalist and Wall Street cares about the people is their sweat.
All they care about the environment is the money they can extract from it."DRILL, BABY, DRILL." Why can't
they collect the oil at the hole? WHERE ARE ALL OF THESE "SMART, SMART, PEOPLE" OF BP OIL?

Mixturism, unlike other “isms,” would not put people into straightjackets as they try to solve their economic problems. Other “isms” allow for only certain methods to be used in solving problems and limit the number of solutions acceptable to them. In mixturism, the solution to the problem is deemed more important than the method used to find the solution or the method by which the solution is used.

Mixturism would not destroy any system that presently exists, but would call for the flexability to use what is good in all systems to solve the problems of the people of this planet. Violent revolution and terrorism can be avoided if nations are flexible in their approaches to problems and to their solutions.

Mixturism is a proper mixing of private and public enterprise in any activity of a socioeconomic system so that the needs of all people in the society can be best met and progress promoted for all the people of this planet. The mixing of private and public enterprise, or the partnership of private and public enterprise, should be similar to a reversible reaction.

If public enterprise can do a better job than private enterprise in any area of endeavor, then private enterprise must give way to public enterprise. When private enterprise can do a better job than public enterprise, then public enterprise must give way to private enterprise. When neither enterprise by itself can fill the vacuum that exists in economic development, then private and public enterprise must form a partnership to fill the vacuum. The needs of the people must take preference over profit. Meeting the needs of all the people must be the determining factor as to which enterprise...private, public, or joint private and public...is to be used.

The chief goal of people is to survive their duration on this planet in the best possible fashion. Progress, or achievement of the “best possible fashion,” is anything which leads to every person on this planet having the best of all the goods and services that are needed for quality living. At the very least, every person should enjoy the right to a good job, health care and enough space for a home and a place of privacy for the duration of life.

The struggle between socialism and capitalism revolves around the questions of whether every person has a right to a job at wages high enough for quality living. Some say there has to be a top and bottom. If this is true, the bottom should be quality living. No one should be opposed to anyone living rich, just to anyone living poor.

Governments have two main functions: first, to guarantee the rights and freedoms of its people and, second, to provide a political and economic system whereby the people can have quality living. Since the time of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, governments have had available to them a prototype >

Transfer interrupted!

Any government which does not guarantee its people the means to obtain jobs at wages high enough for quality living has fallen short of its duty to its people. Through the philosophy of mixturism, a government can provide and guarantee quality living for all its people by creating a reserve-retraining work force which would eliminate the need for welfare and unemployment. We'll look in detail at this later.

Mixturism is a middle-of-the-road, hybrid doctrine. It borrows the best features of both capitalism and socialism. Mixturism is pragmatic. It asks what is the problem and what is the solution. It employs whatever method will solve the problem most effectively, regardless of labels. If public programs are judged to be the more appropriate approach for the solution of a specific problem, then that is the method used. If private enterprise can do a better job, then that approach is taken.

Mixturism is not dogmatic or preferential in deciding whether government or business or both together tackle the problem. The only criterion applied is who can do the job better. The notion that governments should subscribe to only one type of political philosophy at a time, one “ism” is fallacious. With mixturism, the solution to the problem is more important than the philosophy or methodology.

We may draw a stunning analogy between the evolution of life on earth and the development of human society. The first life forms were primitive, yet completely autonomous, single-celled organisms. For a time, they existed quite well without assistance from others. As the number of organisms increased, many cells began to live together, forming colonies. Soon, particular cells in the group began to evolve differently and to specialize in varied tasks for the benefit of the group. With this division of labor, an interdependence slowly emerged. Now cells counted on their neighbors to perform services for them. We see the same scenario unfolding in human culture. Individuals in the beginning were self-reliant, able to meet all needs themselves. This period was followed by group living, and that followed by division of labor, the result of which is in an interdependent society.

We are now far removed from that society of rugged individualism. We have transformed our society into a culture whose individual members depend on one another. We must therefore develop a government ethic which reflects and nurtures that concept. Mixturism fills that bill best, for it ensures that the government takes an active role in guaranteeing the rights and freedoms of its people in providing a system whereby everyone might enjoy a quality standard of living. It also ensures that the country contributes to the UN peace-keeping efforts and maintains a strong national defense. Any government that does less for its citizenry falls short of meeting its goals.

**Order Form**
First Name:	Last Name:
Home Phone:	Work Phone:
E-Mail Address:
Shipping Address:

Please print this page, fill in the appropriate spaces and mail to:
Mixturism
2201 SOUTHERN SHADE BLVD.
KNOXVILLE, TENN. 37932

Discounts for multiple copies for distribution by individuals or organizations are available.

HAS THE NEWS MEDIA NEVER READ ARTICLE 1, SECTION 8, OF THE CONSTITUTION?
If they have, they should know that the Federal Government has all the power it needs to control the
money supply; and to create all the money needed to exchange all the goods and services that the
hands and minds of people can produce. They should know that the hands of the Government
should not be tied when it comes to bailing out the uncontrolled Free Market Capitalist in
order to save the whole economy.

BIG GOVERNMENT VERY IMPORTANT!!!
With the Free Market Capitalist running wild with every Tom, Dick, Jane and Mary
doing his or her own thing without regard for anyone else, we need an entity big
enough to put the train back on track when it runs off the track. If there had been
a big Government in 1930, the great depression could have been prevented.

SELL THE GOLD AT FORT KNOX
Since the Government is on paper money and can and should produce all we need, we
should sell all the gold at Fort Knox and pay down the National Debt which the Republicans
think is so important; even if they have a false impression of the National Debt, this would
take away all their talking points.

ECONOMIC MELT DOWN
DON'T BLAME THE GOVERNMENT FOR THE ECONOMIC MELT DOWN. BLAME THE
UNCONTROLED FREE MARKET CAPTALIST. YOU SHOULD BE THANKING PRESIDENT
OBAMA AND THE DEMOCRAT CONGRESS FOR BAILING OUT THE GREED OF WALL
STREET IN ORDER TO PREVENT ANOTHER DEPRESSION. THE TRAIN IS BACK ON
TRACK; DON'T DERAIL IT BY VOTING FOR REPUBLICANS.

JOBS ARE BACK
BIG BUSINESS WILL CREATE THE NEW JOBS; THEY HAVE THE MONEY UNDER THEIR MATTRESS.
SMALL BUSINESSES DO NOT HAVE THE MONEY AND CAN'T GET IT. With three million baby boomers
retiring this year and more in the years to follow, big business realize they must hire now or get left behind.They
want the best of the experience unemployed, and they know that now is the time to hire them. The unemployment
rate will be below 6% come November. This off year election will be different; the republicans will lose big time.
Big business has trillons of dollars stored in cyber space; they have stopped the buck; they are going to hire, hire!!
With the billions of stimulus money and the billions of bailout money, all of the bucks turned lose by the Central Bank
has the Obama train rolling around the bend and picking up speed and bring the jobs back. Labor will soon be in the
driver's seat. PRAISE TO OBAMA AND THE DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS!!!

TO BIG TO FAIL
A bad idea promoted by ignorant people like Larry Kudlow of CNBC. The Federal Government
should not tie her hands. Since the Federal Government controls the money supply, it has the power to
bailout what ever needs to be bailed out. The Constitution does not say that America has to be an
uncontroled Free Market Capitalist system. The Federal Government is the only entity worth a
quadrillion dollars. If it ever goes broke, we can have Golden Sach take it public.The bailout was
a good thing. It prevented a great depression. We need to be able to do it again if we need to.
The tax payers made money on the bailout. We should have learned how to use a new tool.
The federal Government is the only entity big enough, and has the power to create money to
keep balance in the economy; and bring the economy in balance when it get out of balance.
Praise be to big government, and its ability to act and bring balance when the Free Market
Capitalist screw things up!!!

SAVE FANNIE MAE AND FREDDY MAC SO THEY CAN MAKE MORE PRIME SUB LOANS AND
GET MORE PEOPLE IN GOOD HOUSING. We should not lose track that the houses built are still
there and have real value. Contractors made millions, millions of people had jobs and bought millions
of goods and services. Money is the medium which the Government can create plenty. Goods and services
have real value.

CHEIF JUSTICE JOHN GLOVER ROBERTS JR. SHOULD RESIGN. THIS REPUBLICAN IDEOLOGY
SHOULD LEAVE FOR GRANTING CORPORATIONS THE RIGHT TO DESTROY THE POLITICAL
SYSTEM WITH UNLIMITED CONTRIBUTIONS.

LARRY KUDLOW OF CNBC IS A FIRST CLASS IDIOT, AND SARAH PALIN IS A SECOND CLASS.
GENERAL ELECTRIC PRODUCTS ARE NO BETTER; IT OWNS CNBC.

LET GREECE DEFAULT. GREECE IS JUST A DROP IN THE OCEAN. LET US FIND OUT WHAT WILL HAPPEN .
IT WILL STOP THE WALL STREET CHATTER. IF GREECE KNOWS THAT IT IS GOODS AND SERVICES THAT
HAVE REAL VALUE, THEY CAN DROP THE EURO AND CREATE THIER OWN MONEY. THE DEBT HAS ALREADY
MOVE ALL THE GOODS AND SERVICES IT IS GOING TO. GET THE DEBT OFF YOUR BACK, GREECE; AND YOU
CAN MOVE ON TO GREATER THINGS. MONEY IS ONLY PAPER AND BYTES ON A COMPUTER CHIP. GOODS AND
SERVICES HAVE REAL VALUE.

THE FED SHOULD NOT RAISE INTEREST RATES NOW OR IN THE NEAR FUTURE. IT SHOULD KNOW THAT
INFLATION IS A EUPHEMISM FOR THEFT. INTEREST RATES SHOULD BE LOW AND STABLE ALL THE TIME.

WE NEED A CABINET DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMERS AFFAIRS TO PROTECT THE CONSUMERS FROM
PRICE GOUGING BY THE BIG FREE MARKET CAPITALIST.

WEST VIRGINIA COAL INDUSTRY IS A GOOD EXAMPLE OF LARRY KUDLOW OF CNBC
UNCONTROLLED FREE MARKET CAPITALISM AT WORK. YOU DON'T HAVE TO GO TO
AVATAR TO SEE THE STRONG RUN OVER THE WEAK; JUST GO TO WEST VIRGINIA.
Every time I hear Larry Kudlow extolling the virtues of Free Market Capitalism and his Tea Party and the
Republican Party, I get a hammer and beat on a General Electric product. General Electric is the owner
of CNBC. The consumer can and should fight back.

STUDENT LOANS--CONGRESS STOPS THE DEVIL DAMN BANKS FROM SKIMMING THE
CREAM OFF OF STUDENT LOAN MILK. WE SHOULD DO THE SAME FOR SMALL BUSINESSES
BY SKIPPING THE BANKS AND LENDING DIRECTLY TO SMALL BUSINESSES. WHY SHOULD THE FREE
MARKET CAPITALIST BE ALLOW TO TAKE A TOLL OUT OF EVERYTHING. THE CONSTITUTION
CALLS FOR FOR FAIR AND FREE TRADE MIXTURISM.

SHAME ON REPUBLICANS FOR VOTING NO ON HEALTH-CARE
ALL WE WILL HAVE TO DO IS LOOK FOR THE (R) BEFORE YOUR NAME
WE WILL DEFEAT YOU IN NOVEMBER 2010

THE NEWS MEDIA'S LIFE BLOOD IS ADVERTISING. WHY DOSES THE MEDIA TAKE TAINTED
BLOOD FROM THE OPPONENTS OF THE HEALTH-CARE BILL? WOULD THEY RUN A ANTI-SEMITIC AD?
ANDERSON COOPER, KEEP THEM HONEST
]

WELCOME COFFEE PARTY
It is time for all good liberals to come to the aid of his or her country.
Big Government is good. We need to make it bigger and better.

GOV. OF CALF. IS RIGHT MORE MONEY FROM THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
Since the states gave up their right to create money, the Federal Government has the
responsibility to create the money the states need to balance their budgets. Article 1,
Section 8, of the Constitution gave the Federal Government power to create money.
Money must be created first before equal value can be created. The Federal Government
needs to create enough new money now to give each state five hundred million dollars for
each member of congress, which would be equal distribution. Goods and services is what
has real value--not money, which is mostly numbers on a computer chip. Over 5% growth
in GDP proves that money must be created before equal value can be created. The stimulas
and the bail-outs of banks and auto makers.
internetfreepress.com

SOLUTIONS TO CALIFORNIA'S MONEY PROBLEMS
California could create its own money by making it good only in the state of
California and exchangeable with the dollar in California. Since the Federal Government
has a stupid money policy, there is no need for California to be broke when money is only
a medium of exchange for goods and services. California could withdraw from the United States
and become a new country. It could then create its own money supply like 191 other countries-- which
would be good anywhere in the world. This would get the USA of the off of a gold standard mentality.
Article 1, Section 8, Constitution gives the Federal Government the power to keep a balanced money supply. New money
should be made available to all the states without any matching funds required for creating jobs and funding new
businesses which produces new jobs. Goods and services have real value. Money is only numbers on a computer chip
which exchanges goods and services.
internetfreepress.com

I WONDER ABOUT DAVID GERGEN, AN EXPERT WHO APPEARS ON CNN NEWS, WHO HAS ADVISED
ALL OF THOSE PAST PRESIDENTS. HE IS JUST A REPUBLICAN IDEOLOGY WHO THINKS A PRESIDENT
SHOULDN'T PAT HIS HEAD AND RUB HIS BELLEY AT THE SAME TIME--BUT OBAMA CAN; AND THAT IS
WHAT BOTHERS REPUBLICANS. DAVID THINKS THAT OBAMA CAN'T DO HEALTH-CARE, JOBS AND TRY
TERRORIST AT THE SAME TIME. I THOUGHT DAVID AND BILL BENNET'S BROTHER WERE THE FOXES IN
PRESIDENT CLINTON'S CHICKEN COOP WHEN PRESIDENT CLINTON WAS PRESIDENT.
internetfreepress.com

GIVE THE STATES SOME NEW MONEY SO THEY CAN SOLVE THEIR EDUCATIONAL PROBLEMS; THEY GAVE UP THEIR POWER TO
CREATE MONEY TO BECOME PART OF THE USA. SEE ARTICLE 1, BELOW.

STIMULUS MONEY AND MONEY FOR THE JOBS BILL SHOULD HAVE BEEN CREATED--NOT BORROWED!!!! SEE ARTICLE 1, SECTION 8, OF
THE CONSTITUTION BELOW.

WHAT THE REPUBLICANS FEAR MOST IN NOVEMBER IS PASSAGE OF THE HEALTH-CARE BILL
Get on board Democrats--you have nothing to fear. Vote no if you want to lose your seat. You will have Democrats and republicans
voting against you.

SENATOR JIM BUNNING IS THE EPITOME OF THE IGNORANCE
OF THE REPUBLICANS ABOUT THE NATIONAL DEBT-- WHICH IS
THE BIGGEST FRAUD EVER PERPETRATED ON THE AMERICAN
PEOPLE. TO TELL THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THAT THE
GOVERNMENT'S DEBT IS THE SAME AS THEIRS IS A
BIG LIE. ARTICLE 1, SECTION 8, OF THE CONSTITUTION GIVES THE
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THE POWER TO CREATE MONEY AND IT
DOES AND SHOULD. MONEY IS NOTHING MORE THAN
METAL, PAPER, AND MOSTLY BYTES ON A COMPUTER
CHIP. GOODS AND SERVICES IS WHAT HAS REAL VALUE.
TWENTY MILLION UNEMPLOYED PEOPLE COULD BE PRODUCING
EVEN MORE GOODS AND SERVICES IF WE WERE NOT HUNG UP
OVER A STUPID NATIONAL DEBT. IT IS A BIG SHAME THAT THE NEWS
MEDIA AND THE MEMBERS OF CONGRESS DO NOT KNOW WHAT
ARTICLE 1, SECTION 8, OF THE CONSTITUTION SAYS.

GET TOUGH, MR. PRESIDENT. TO HELL WITH
THE DEVIL DAMN
DO NOTHING REPUBLICANS. PASS THE HEALTH-CARE BILL
BY HOOK OR CROOK. GET IT DONE! GET IT DONE! GET IT DONE!

U.S. Constitution - Article 1 Section 8

PLEASE, CNN NEWS--NOW THAT YOU'VE HAD YOUR WEEK
ALONG WITH THE REPUBLICANS BASHING THE GOVERNMENT.
WHY NOT SPEND A WEEK POINTING OUT ALL THE GOOD THINGS
THE GOVERNMENT DOES? SEE LIST BELOW. JACK CAFFERTY'S BIG,
ARROGANT MOUTH HAD NO SOLUTIONS AS PROMISED. HE IS JUST
ANOTHER REPUBLICAN IDEOLOGY. HE ONLY READS COMMENTS FROM
HIS BLOG THAT HIS STAFF WRITES TO REFLECT HIS OWN VIEWS. HE REFERS
TO OTHERS AS CLOWNS; HE COULD APPLY THE SAME WORD TO HIMSELF.
internetfreepress.com

WHAT AMERICA NEEDS TO DO IS NOT BE FLIM FLAM BY THE ABOVE PEOPLE WHO
WOULD TEAR DOWN AMERICA. THEY WOULD DO MORE DAMAGE TO AMERICA
THAN THE TERRORIST OF 9/11. THE AMERCIAN PEOPLE OUGHT TO GIVE PRESIDENT
OBAMA IN 2010 A SUPER MAJORITY IN THE HOUSE AND A 30 SEAT REPUBLICAN SENATE
SO WE CAN DO THE THINGS THAT WILL MAKE AMERICA EVEN GREATER. HOW WOULD
THE TAXES BE COLLECTED WITHOUT THE IRS?

PRESIDENT OBAMA'S SUMMIT WITH THE DEMOCRATS AND
REPUBLICANS PROVED ONE THING THAT DEMOCRATS CARE
ABOUT HEALTH-CARE FOR THE PEOPLE, AND THE REPUBLICANS
CARE ABOUT PROTECTING INSURANCE COMPANIES, DOCTORS, AND
TAX CUTS FOR THE RICH. WHY DIDN'T THE NEWS MEDIA REPORT IT
LIKE IT IS? THEY ARE BIG BUSINESS!

THANKS TO DAVID GERGEN OF CNN NEWS FOR DOING SOME READING
AT THE INTERNETFREEPRESS. IF HILLARY CLINTON WOULD DO A LITTLE
HOME WORK AT THE INTERNETFREEPRESS, SHE WOULD KNOW THAT
AMERICA DOES NOT NEED TO BE A DEBTOR NATION. JACK CAFFERTY'S
MOUTH IS BROKEN. HE SOUNDS LIKE A TRANSPLANT FROM FOX NEWS

DUMP THE REPUBLICANS, SARAH PALIN, THE JOHN BIRCH SOCIETY, AND
THE TEA PARTY INTO THE BOSTON HARBOR. THESE PEOPLE ARE ABOUT AS
USEFUL IN SOLVING AMERICA'S PROBLEMS AS TITS ON A BOAR HOG. NOW IS
THE TIME FOR ALL GOOD DEMOCRATS (LIBERAL OR OTHERWISE) TO PASS A JOBS
BILL AND THE SENATE HEALTH-CARE BILL.THIS IS THE WAY TO ELECT EVEN MORE
DEMOCRATS IN NOVEMBER. IF DEMOCRATS WANT TO LOSE IN NOVEMBER, JUST KEEP
DRAGGING YOUR FEET.

GOODBYE TO SENATOR CRY BABY BAYH
Now is the time to elect a real Democrat for
Indiana in November 2010. Oh! that self-righteous quitting
speech should have made his wife, mother and God proud.

TAX THE RICH AND TURN THE BUCK LOOSE
If we want to create jobs, we need to get the dollar moving.
The rich have all the money stashed under the mattrerss ( on
a computer chip). Big businesses have trillions of dollars stored
in cyber space.
The only way to stop the buck from moving goods and services
and creating jobs after it is released is to tax it out of the economy, store
it on a computer chip, steal it by upping prices and calling it inflation or by
growing the economy--which is the best way by creating more jobs and more
goods and services.

WE NEED TO RE-THINK THE MEDIUM OF EXCHANGE
Taxation should be for the purpose of taking money out of circulation
and putting money into circulation. This could be done by indexing the tax system
so money could be put in or taken out by lowering or raising the index number. The
key is to have a medium of exchange equivalent to the good and services to be exchanged.
The Federal Government should use Article 1, Section 8, of the Constitution to created any
new money needed to pay for Government programs, and give to the 50 states money needed
to balance their budgets. We do not ever need to borrow money from China or any other country.
The National Debt is not needed. Goods and services is what has value; and as long as there
are people able to work and resources, we can produce them.
internetfreepress.com

Let the Federal Government put all the people on Medicare, and let
the insurance companies provide the supplement plan like they do for retires.
We don’t need to put money down a rat hole by subsidizing insurance companies.
Medicare did not socialize medicine. People still choose their own doctor. Private
companies still run the hospitals. Private insurance companies sell the supplement
insurance. This is Mixturism: Business and Government working together to provide
health insurance for senior citizens. It is the right way to cover all people in America.

The congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, impost and excises, to pay the debts and
provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States; to borrow money on the credit
of the United States; TO COIN MONEY, REGULATE THE VALUE THEREOF, AND OF FOREIGN COIN,
AND FIX THE STANDARD OF WEIGHTS AND MEASURES...

The Five-Finger Common Sense Agenda

1. ADEQUATE MONETARY SYSTEM: The three functions of the Federal Reserve are to lower or raise
discount rates, to buy or sell securities on the open market, and to lower or raise the reserve requirements for member
banks.These are inadequate for maintaining a balanced money supply at all times. Adding a FOURTH FUNCTION
to the monetary system that would index the PAYROLL TAX on a scale of 1 to 15 would bring balance.
The index could be lowered when more money is desired in the consumers' pockets and raised when less is needed.

2. RESERVE RETRAINING WORK FORCE: The greatest problem facing

America

is
EMPLOYMENT AND UNEMPLOYMENT TOO. This problem can be PERMANENTLY solved by
establishing a Reserve Retraining Work Force. Everyone would be in the regular work force or in the
Reserve-Retraining Work Force. All unemployment would be by choice.

3. ALL AMERICANS WHO WANT TO OWN A HOME-- HOME OWNERSHIP SHOULD
BE POSSIBLE REGARDLESS OF INCOME.
The Federal Government should endow a HOME LOAN FUND, so anyone making below average wages could
borrow money to finance a home at an interest rate from 1% to 5% FOR UP TO 50 YEARS.

4. HEALTH-CARE SYSTEM
Since the average hospital claim is about $8000.00, the Federal government could pay all claims
over $8000.00 for a lot less than the proposed health-care bill now before Congress. This will bring
real competition.Without having to worry about the one claim in a million for a million dollars, small businesses and small organizations could self-insure which would bring about competition in the insurance
industry where none now exist.

5. A FIRST CLASS EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM CAN BEST BE ESTABLISHED BY
HAVING THE TEACHER BECOME THE DIRECTOR OF A PLANNED PROGRAM
THAT WILL REACH ALL OBJECTIVES DESIRED. BY USING THE BEST OF
SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, WE COULD SPEND A BILLION DOLLARS
ON EVERY COURSE BEING TAUGHT IN HIGH SCHOOL THAT
WOULD TEACH EVERYTHING KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT BY
EXPERTS; AND THAT WOULD BE CHEAPER THAN WHAT WE ARE
NOW SPENDING.

The rational economic, ethical and political philosophy for the 21st century and beyond

Mixturism

We have previously defined mixturism as the private sector working together
with the public sector to meet the needs of the people a common sense approach. The idea that the use of one
economic system, such as socialism or capitalism, can meet the needs of all the people is a fallacy.
In order to encompass the different needs and desires of many people, economic systems must be flexible.

Mixturism, unlike other “isms,” would not put people into straightjackets as
they try to solve their economic problems. Other “isms” allow for only certain
methods to be used in solving problems and limit the number of solutions acceptable to them. In mixturism, the solution
to the problem is deemed more important than the method used to find the solution or the method by which the solution is used.

Mixturism would not destroy any system that presently exists, but would call for the flexability to use what is good in all systems to solve the problems
of the people of this planet. Violent revolution and terrorism can be avoided if nations are flexible in their approaches to problems and to their solutions.

Mixturism is a proper mixing of private and public enterprise in any activity
of a socioeconomic system so that the needs of all people in the society can be
best met and progress promoted for all the people of this planet. The mixing of private and
public enterprise, or the partnership of private and public enterprise, should be similar to a reversible reaction.

If public enterprise can do a better job than private enterprise in any area of endeavor, then private enterprise must give way to public enterprise.
When private enterprise can do a better job than public enterprise, then public enterprise must give way to private enterprise. When neither
enterprise by itself can fill the vacuum that exists in economic development, then private and public enterprise must form a partnership to
fill the vacuum. The needs of the people must take preference over profit. Meeting the needs of
all the people must be the determining factor as to which enterprise...private, public, or joint private and public...is to be used.

The chief goal of people is to survive their duration on this planet in the best possible fashion. Progress, or achievement of the “best possible fashion,” is
anything which leads to every person on this planet having the best of all the goods and services that are needed for quality living. At the very
least, every person should enjoy the right to a good job, health care and enough space for a home and a place of privacy for the duration of life.

The struggle between socialism and capitalism revolves around the questions of whether every person has a right to a job at wages high enough
for quality living. Some say there has to be a top and bottom. If this is true, the bottom
should be quality living. No one should be opposed to anyone living rich, just to anyone living poor.

Governments have two main functions: first, to guarantee the rights and freedoms of its people and, second, to provide a political and economic
system whereby the people can have quality living. Since the time of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, governments
have had available to them a prototype by which the world could be brought to a higher degree of development.

Any government which does not guarantee its people the means to obtain jobs at wages high enough for quality living has fallen short of its duty to its people.
Through the philosophy of mixturism, a government can provide and guarantee quality living for all its people by creating
a reserve-retraining work force which would eliminate the need for welfare and unemployment. We'll look in detail at this later.

Mixturism is a middle-of-the-road, hybrid doctrine. It borrows the best features of both capitalism and socialism. Mixturism is pragmatic. It asks what is
the problem and what is the solution. It employs whatever method will solve the problem most effectively, regardless of labels. If public programs are
judged to be the more appropriate approach for the solution of a specific problem, then
that is the method used. If private enterprise can do a better job, then that approach is taken.

Mixturism is not dogmatic or preferential in deciding whether government or business or both together tackle the problem. The only criterion applied is
who can do the job better. The notion that governments should subscribe to only one type of political philosophy at a
time, one “ism” is fallacious. With mixturism, the solution to the problem is more important than the philosophy or methodology.

We may draw a stunning analogy between the evolution of life on earth and the development of human society. The first life forms were primitive, yet
completely autonomous, single-celled organisms. For a time, they existed quite well without assistance from others. As the number of organisms increased, many
cells began to live together, forming colonies. Soon, particular cells in the group began to evolve differently and to specialize in varied tasks for the benefit
of the group. With this division of labor, an interdependence slowly emerged. Now cells counted on their neighbors to perform services for them. We see
the same scenario unfolding in human culture. Individuals in the beginning were self-reliant, able to meet all needs themselves. T
his period was followed by group living, and that followed by division of labor, the result of which is in an interdependent society.

We are now far removed from that society of rugged individualism. We have transformed our society into a culture whose individual members depend
on one another. We must therefore develop a government ethic which reflects and nurtures that concept. Mixturism fills that bill best, for it ensures that the
government takes an active role in guaranteeing the rights and freedoms of its people in providing a system whereby everyone might enjoy a quality standard
of living. It also ensures that the country contributes to the UN peace-keeping efforts and maintains
a strong national defense. Any government that does less for its citizenry falls short of meeting its goals.

USA TODAY HEADLINE AUGUST 11, 09

TEN BILLION DOLLARS ENDOWNMENT FOR A HOME LOAN FUND
FOR PEOPLE MAKING TEN DOLLARS AN HOUR OR UNDER
Now is the time for the Federal Government to set up a home ownership
fund for people making ten dollars an hour or less so these people can
own their own home. Every person would be able to get at least one loan
to buy a house that the payment would not be over 30% of their income. Good
credit, bad credit or no credit everyone would be egible. Interest rates would
be low and fixed for up to a period of 40 years.

You can call it Free Enterprise if you like, but the banking system controls the faucet for the life blood of all enterprise.
It can put the economy on its back, and it can put people in soup lines. Interest rates should always be low and
stable, and money should always be available to exchange the goods and services that the hands and minds of people produce.
There is no need ever for a roller coaster economy of booms and busts. The medium of exchange
is too important to all enterprise to be in the hands of private enterprise.

RECESSION is a product of the blatant ignorance of the President, Congress, Economists, and
the News Media who do not understand Nature's Basic Law of Economics, and
Article 1, Section 8, of the Constitution.

Nature’s Basic Law of Economics states: All goods and services flow from the action of people resources on natural
resources— Money is the medium of exchange which should be equal to the value of the goods and
services—and not to a gold standard or some other insane idea.

Order copy of Nature's Basic Law of Economics for only $10.00 postage and handling included
2201 Southern Shade Blvd. Knoxville, TN 37932

THE GREATEST DANGER FACING

AMERICA

TODAY IS THE MINDSET THAT THE REPUBLICAN
PARTY HAS ABOUT MONEY. They have not read Article 1, section 8, of the Constitution which gives
the Federal Government the power to create money equivalent to the value of the goods and services
the American people produce. The lack of money is the cause of this recession.

The ignorance of people like Lou Dobbs (a Republican who is ashamed to be called one), and people like Rush
Limbaugh, Bill O’Reily, Hannity’s America (not a place I would like to live), and Glen Beck (who have no shame) is
overwhelming the ideas that cause economic problems, and then they try
to prevent problems from being solved by feeding their ignorant ideas to the Republicans.

If Republicans would take two great steps forward by forcing Democrats to support a one pay Universal
Health-Care System and a new Department of Consumers Affairs, they could win the hearts and minds of millions.

Universal Health Care would make it possible for all Ma and Pa businesses to compete with the Wal-Mart’s which
killed millions of small businesses. It would help many small businesses with fewer than twenty five employees to
compete with larger companies. With a Department of ConsumersAffairs, consumers
could control the price gouging by big oil and big business which destroys the medium of exchange.

NATIONAL DEBT… Those who think that

America

could go broke or be ruined because of the national debt are not thinking.
As long as

America

has people resources and natural resources,

America

will be able to produce goods and services which have real value.
he present national debt has already moved the goods and services. It has no more value. It never needed to be in the first place.
It only exists because of the belief that money should be tied to something other than the value of the goods and services it exchanges.

TAXATION should be one of a three- legged stool consisting of: creating money, borrowing money and taxing in order to have
a balanced money supply. Taxation should be on a fixed rate—but indexed. Creating new money
should be accepted. Borrowing money should be given more thought.

A TRILLION DOLLARS IS A SMALL AMOUNT OF MONEY relative to the
world economy, and the money needed to exchange goods and services.

Why doesn’t the news media know that the word INFLATION is just an EUPHEMISM for theft?

President Obama is the person who will make my dreams come true.

My Vision For the 21st Century and Beyond

For many people around the world, the coming of the year 2000 seems to have little significance...nothing more than a change of numbers on the calendar
or a different set of digits on a computer screen or in a personal checkbook. But I view the approach of the new millennium quite differently. To me, it
seems a most auspicious occasion, truly a time for a new beginning for humankind...a time when human hearts, minds and souls will be receptive to a new
philosophy, a time when people around the world will long for and finally achieve a common mindset...leading to a collective
attitude that, for the first time in human history, will usher in a long-lasting era of peace and prosperity for all citizens of planet earth.

Indeed, by the year 2000, many factors favoring an instant mindset change will already be in place...communicative, scientific, and technological advancements; improved
worldwide economic conditions; settlement of geographic disputes; and growing political and religious tolerance. These factors will give citizens of planet earth cause to
reflect, to adopt a new mindset one making it possible for those who have plenty to have even more and those who have not, to have plenty.

     At the center of this new mindset are three fundamental principles: One, the world is now, more than ever before, an interdependent society, one where citizens of
one country need the products and services of many others. Two, supplies of both people resources and natural resources already exist which are sufficient for supplying
goods and services to satisfy the needs and desires of the entire world. Three, the United Nations can be restructured in the following ways: It should be empowered with
authority to function as the world s police, with the ability for enforcing a new world order; it should have the right to hold leaders of any nation responsible for conflicts they
might cause; and it should have powers of indictment for the purpose of bringing them to justice. The United Nations should
dedicate itself to helping nations to work together to bring about practical solutions to common problems.

    But how can we bring about a spirit of cooperation between government, business and the people? How can we unite public and private sectors in a working
relationship such that the doors to individual opportunity will be flung wide open for all? How can we reshape our community so that all people will be able to find
their way into society and reap fully the rewards of their labors? The answer, mixturism, a philosophy that
blends the best features of public and private enterprise where pragmatism, not labels, rules.

    History has shown that pure capitalism and pure socialism are deeply flawed. When one or the other system is practiced exclusively, problems are created, not solved.
On the other hand, mixturism applies whichever approach seems most likely to solve a problem, regardless of whether it
involves the private sector, the public sector, or joint private and public sectors working together.
The philosophy of mixturism recognizes that there are five basic human needs which must be met: First, we must have a health care system that will provide the very best
in medical care for everyone, from conception to death. Individual personal income should not determine eligibility. Second, we must develop a public and private system
of education that will provide the best possible academic and vocational training for all people. Third, we must establish a reserve-retraining work-force system, surrounded
and supported by full-service child-care capabilities. With such a system in place, no one who wants a job will ever be without one. Fourth, we must make it possible for
every person to have a decent place to live, be it a house, an apartment or a condominium. To achieve this, we must be courageous enough to limit the number of people
through sensible population control. Fifth, we must have a monetary system that will provide a balanced
money supply at all times, one that is equivalent to the goods and services people s hands
and minds can produce.
Mixturism addresses all these basic human needs. But to maximize the effectiveness of this philosophy, individuals must assume responsibility for their own
success in life, recognizing that the family is paramount and that concern for the well-being of others is crucial to maintaining a civilized order. Each nation
must work toward becoming a democratic society and must guarantee its people an individual bill of rights. The United Nations must protect these rights.
But we must also ensure that the U.S. military can reinforce the United Nations and be independently capable of halting any aggression on its own.

To more fully understand this, let's take a realistic look at how stock markets function. The rise and fall of the stock market is essential for the stock market to work
at all. If prices continually decline, no one would buy stock. If stock prices continually
increase, people would put all their money in the stock market, which would bankrupt the rest of the economy.

The economic effect of the rise and fall of the stock markets is a misconception and is, in fact, just the opposite of what people are told. Most of the hundreds of
stocks that are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, NASDAQ and the American Exchange are not new stock issues. Most of them have been on the stock
exchanges for years. When a new stock is issued to raise money to start a new company, it has a very positive effect on the economy by creating new jobs which
produce more goods and services — the real wealth of a nation. What a stock sells for after the initial sale has no positive effect on the economy unless it sells for less.
When the price of old stock drops, it takes fewer dollars to pay for the same stock certificate; therefore making more dollars available to purchase other items.
If the price of an old stock goes up, it merely takes more dollars out of the economy to purchase
the same stock certificate. This has the same destroying effect on the money supply as inflation.

The up and down cycles of the stock markets are made to work by the people who have seats on the stock exchanges, program buyers, and by institutional managers
of many different kinds of pension, money-market , and a host of other funds. These people can make the stock market go up or down by selling or buying big blocks
of stocks or by using any kind of psychological or capricious ideas around to justify their actions. Whichever direction the wind blows, the stockbrokers receive their
commission. Stockbrokers have the best of both worlds; they get a commission when the stock is purchased and also when the stock is sold.
Whether the stock is selling high or low or whether the stockholder is making money or losing money, the commission is still paid.

No one is suggesting that the stock markets should be done away with, but the real role they play in the economy ought to be understood so that their influence on
economic stability is lessened. Whether the stock markets are up or down, the thing that should provide for a healthy, growing economy is an
adequate money supply…one which can exchange all the goods and services the highly productive American workers produce.

If your Congresswoman isn’t bringing home some pork, get rid of him or her and elect
someone who can. What do these idiots think we elect them to do? Pork produces jobs.

Someone ought to get an earmark and study the bridge to nowhere to see how many jobs it created, how many pairs
of shoes were sold, how many cars were bought, how many homes were sold, and how many tables was bread put on.

THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CAN NOT GO BANKRUPT; IT HAS THE POWER TO
CREATE MONEY (ARTICLE 1, SECTION 8, OF THE CONSTITUTION).

HOW CAN THE INTELLIGENTSIA OF AMERICA BE SO BLINDED that they cannot see that the Federal Government must
have a money system that can create and maintain an equivalent ratio of money to the goods and services that its peoples’
hands and minds can produce? Nature’s Basic Law of Economics
states: All goods and services flow from the action of
people resources on natural resources— Money is the medium of exchange which should be equal to
the value of the goods and services—and not to a gold standard or some other insane idea.

The question should be: are there people resources and natural resources available for both?
Money can be created (Article 1, section 8, of the Constitution). When are we going to wake up?

HOW TO GET THE ECONOMY BACK ON TRACK IN A
FLASH BY GIVING 535 BILLION DOLLARS TO THE STATES

TAX CUTS FOR THE RICH AND FLOAT DRIED UP
MONEY SUPPLY When the rich get tax cuts, they don’t put it
under their mattress; but what they do with it has the same effect. They store it as bytes on
computer chips. They don’t spend the money that’s needed to moves goods and services.

The efficiency of the clearing houses for financial institutions has dried up trillions of dollars in float. You can’t beat a check
to the bank any more. Debit cards, paying bills on line, buying on the internet with Pay Pal and the many other ways that
money can instantly be taken out of bank accounts has dried up the money supply. When you could beat a local check to the
bank and when it took an out of town check ten days to clear the bank, there were billions of dollars that could be
spent by the depositors and billions that could be loaned out by the banks. WHERE ARE THE ECONOMISTS?

Mr. President, if you had caught Osama bin Laden yesterday, would you be sending 17,000 more
troops to

Afghanistan

? It may not be the most important thing in the world to catch bin Laden.
There is more than one kind of warfare. Osama used

USA

planes to take down the World Trade Center.
Pretty smart if you look at it from a point of view that everything is fair in war. But is bin Laden being
much smarter now by sucking the

USA

into a black hole in

Afghanistan

? Generals are somewhat
like football players: they know how to run the same plays that they learn in high school and nothing more.
If my street finder can direct my car to any location, and if you can find a cell phone in a jungle, and with
all of our satellites, technology, our missile systems, our bombers and our Navy—why should we ever
go on a war mission that we can’t get back home in time for dinner with the family? Mr. President, don’t get
bogged down in

Afghanistan

like President Johnson did in

Vietnam

and miss a great opportunity to make

America

a great place for everyone. Anyway you would be more likely to find
Osama in

Saudi Arabia

than in

Afghanistan

Pakistan

**Order Form**
First Name:	Last Name:
Home Phone:	Work Phone:
E-Mail Address:
Shipping Address:

*Tennessee residents add 9.25% sales tax.

All credit orders must bear valid signature. Fax order to 432-974-4320

Please print this page, fill in the appropriate spaces and mail to:
National Paperback Books
3102 Schaad Rd.
Knoxville, TN 37921

Description	Quantity	Unit Price	Total (Qty x Price)
MIXTURISM		$9.95
		TN 8.25% tax
		Shipping
		Total

VISA CARD #	MASTER CARD #
Expiration Date:	Signature:

Description	Quantity	Unit Price	Total (Qty x Price)
Mixturism		$9.95
Utopia Now		$9.95
Nature's Basic Law of Economics		$8.95
17 Commandments Not From Heaven But From Earth		$6.95
The Problem With Public Education Is Administrative		$5.95
Born Out of the Sun ISBN 0-89826-082-5		$9.95
		Shipping
		Total

VISA CARD #	MASTER CARD #
Expiration Date:	Signature:

How to Solve the Problem of Unemployment

Nature's Basic Law of Economics needs to replace Economics 101

Solution for Public Education Problems

The Stock Markets

Social Security

You can help produce an instant mindset change in the year 2001 that will bring a lasting era of peace and prosperity by ordering the book MIXTURISM to find and promote the ideas that will rule the 21st century and beyond.

Mixturism

Transfer interrupted!

You can help produce an instant mindset change in the year 2001 that will bring a lasting era of peace and prosperity by ordering the book MIXTURISM to find and promote the ideas that will rule the 21st century and beyond.

U.S. Constitution - Article 1 Section 8

Mixturism

USA TODAY HEADLINE AUGUST 11, 09

President Obama is the person who will make my dreams come true.

The Stock Markets

IF UFO'S ARE REAL, FIND OUT WHERE THEY'RE FROM. ISBN 0-89826-082-5
Author James M. Carroll's new book, "Born Out of the Sun" tells us where these aliens really come from.

How to Solve the Problem of Unemployment

Nature's Basic Law of Economics needs to replace Economics 101

Solution for Public Education Problems

The Stock Markets

Social Security

You can help produce an instant mindset change in the year 2001 that will bring a lasting era of peace and prosperity by ordering the book MIXTURISM to find and promote the ideas that will rule the 21st century and beyond.

Mixturism

Transfer interrupted!

You can help produce an instant mindset change in the year 2001 that will bring a lasting era of peace and prosperity by ordering the book MIXTURISM to find and promote the ideas that will rule the 21st century and beyond.

U.S. Constitution - Article 1 Section 8

Mixturism

USA TODAY HEADLINE AUGUST 11, 09

President Obama is the person who will make my dreams come true.

The Stock Markets

IF UFO'S ARE REAL, FIND OUT WHERE THEY'RE FROM. ISBN 0-89826-082-5 Author James M. Carroll's new book, "Born Out of the Sun" tells us where these aliens really come from.

IF UFO'S ARE REAL, FIND OUT WHERE THEY'RE FROM. ISBN 0-89826-082-5
Author James M. Carroll's new book, "Born Out of the Sun" tells us where these aliens really come from.